WOODSTOCK, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: R.M. BORSKI AND SONS, INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of R.M. BORSKI AND SONS, INC in 8 STONEBRIDGE ROAD, WOODSTOCK, CT 06281 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340064484.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- R.M. BORSKI AND SONS, INC
- Site address
- 8 STONEBRIDGE ROAD
- City
- WOODSTOCK
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06281
- Mailing
- 446 SENEXTET ROAD, WOODSTOCK, CT 06281
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 G01 I
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system: On or about 11/05/2014 employees at the Stonebridge Road roofing project were exposed to approximately 15' falls. Employees were engaged in roofing activities from a ladder jack scaffold and not wearing fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): On or about 11/05/2014 employees at the Stonebridge Road roofing project were exposed to approximately 15' falls. Employees were engaged in roofing activities without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: On or about 11/05/2015 employees at the Stonebridge Road roofing project were expose to approximately 15' falls. Employees ladder did not extend at least three (3) feet above the landing.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: On or about 11/05/2014 employees at the Stonebridge Road roofing project were exposed to approximately 15' falls. Employees stepladder was used without the spreader bars engaged.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340064484.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.