BOYNTON BEACH, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: KINON SURFACE DESIGN INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KINON SURFACE DESIGN INC. in 2700 QUANTUM BOULEVARD, BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426 (NAICS 327122). OSHA activity number 340067370.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KINON SURFACE DESIGN INC.
- Site address
- 2700 QUANTUM BOULEVARD
- City
- BOYNTON BEACH
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33426
- Mailing
- 2700 QUANTUM BOULEVARD, BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33426
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327122
- Employees
- 24
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 A04
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval: On or about 11/06/2014, at the above mentioned job site, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while using a forklift with an attachment installed to its' mast to lift fiberglass boards and written approval from the manufacturer for the attachment was not received.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2520
- · Z (S) $4200
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy: On or about 11/06/2014, at the above mentioned job site, an employee was storing air hoses adjacent to a damaged outlet box and cover plate exposing himself to an electrical hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $3500
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2015
- Abate by
- May 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: On or about 11/06/14, at the above mentioned job site, the employer did not ensure the company had a written respiratory program for the employees that use half-mask respirators while mixing chemicals and applying an epoxy coating on aluminum decorative boards such as, Isopropyl alcohol, Ancamine, Efka SI 2173, Efka FL 3777, and Efka FA 4654. PLEASE NOTE: CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: On or about 11/06/14, at the above mentioned job site, the employer did not provide employees who voluntarily use respirators with the information contained in Appendix D.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about 11/06/14, at the above mentioned job site, the employer did not ensure employees that use respirators while mixing chemicals such as, Isopropyl alcohol, Ancamine, Efka SI 2173, Efka FL 3777, and Efka FA 4654, and polishing aluminum boards were medically evaluated.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): On or about 11/06/2014, at the above mentioned job site, the employer did not ensure employees who operate forklifts were certified and evaluated by a third party forklift certification company.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1904.7 A
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.7(a): The employer did not record workplace injuries and illnesses that would be considered to meet the general recording criteria, and therefore to be recordable: On or about 11/06/14, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not maintain OSHA 300 forms and did not annotate a restricted duty injury on the OSHA 300 log.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $420
- · Z (O) $700
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327122)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340067370.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.