Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: BRADFORD AUTO BODY, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BRADFORD AUTO BODY, INC. in 2659 W. MAIN STREET, LITTLETON, CO 80120 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 340072628.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bradford Auto Body, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bradford Auto Body, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2659 W. MAIN STREET
City
LITTLETON
State
CO
ZIP
80120
Mailing
2659 W. MAIN STREET, LITTLETON, CO 80120
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.157 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jan 7, 2015
Abate by
Feb 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting:     (a) On or about October 23, 2014, and at times prior, Bradford Auto Body, Inc. did not provide employees with training on the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting. Employees were expected to use fire extinguishers in case of small fires at the facility.       Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $600
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 7, 2015
Abate by
Feb 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:     (a) On or about October 23, 2014, and at times prior, Bradford Auto Body, Inc. did not ensure that compressed air used for cleaning purposes was reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.. A compressed air nozzle in the automobile service shop was observed with a tip that allowed air pressure in excess of 79 p.s.i., exposing employees to air injection hazards.    Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $600
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 7, 2015
Abate by
Feb 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided that will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints and/or terminal screws:     (a) On or about October 23, 2014, and at times prior, Bradford Auto Body, Inc. did not ensure that flexible cord and cables were connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided to prevent pull from being transmitted to joints and/or terminals, exposing employees to contact with electrical hazards:     1. A 110V "Thunderbolt" battery charger was observed with severe strain on its cord at the point where the cord enters the plug.     2. A 110V  "Eagle II" spot welder was observed with severe strain on its cord at the point where the cord enters the machine outer case.         Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $800
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.305 J01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 7, 2015
Abate by
Feb 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(1)(i): Fixtures, lampholders, lamps, rosettes, and receptacles located within 8 feet of the floor had live parts exposed to employee contact:    (a) On or about October 23, 2014, and at times prior, Bradford Auto Body, Inc. did not ensure that all receptacles within 8 feet of the floor did not have live parts exposed to employee contact. A live 110V 4-way receptacle in the body shop preparation area had a broken outlet exposing employees to contact with electrical hazards.      Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $600
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.334 A03 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 7, 2015
Abate by
Feb 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(3)(ii): Attachment plugs and receptacles were connected or altered in a manner which prevented proper continuity of the electric equipment grounding conductor at the point where plugs were attached to receptacles:    a) On or about October 23, 2013, and at times prior, Bradford Auto Body, Inc. did not ensure that all plugs and receptacles had proper continuity of the electric equipment grounding conductor. A 110V jumper box made by Thunderbolt located in the body shop area had a plug with a missing ground prong.     Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $600
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 7, 2015
Abate by
Feb 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:     (a) On or about October 23, 2014, and at times prior, Bradford Auto Body, Inc. did not ensure that employees required to wear 3M and SAS half-face respirators were medically evaluated to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator.      Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $200
  • · Z (O) $400

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 7, 2015
Abate by
Feb 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece was used, and at least annually thereafter:     (a) On or about October 23, 2014, and at times prior, Bradford Auto Body, Inc. did not ensure that employees required to wear 3M and SAS half-face respirators were fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator and at least annually thereafter.      Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $200
  • · Z (O) $400

View Bradford Auto Body, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340072628.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.