Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: M.G. FLYNN CONTRACTING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of M.G. FLYNN CONTRACTING, INC. in 1876 BRONSON ROAD, FAIRFIELD, CT 06824 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340072792.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch M.G. Flynn Contracting, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for M.G. Flynn Contracting, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1876 BRONSON ROAD
City
FAIRFIELD
State
CT
ZIP
06824
Mailing
P.O. BOX 146, EASTON, CT 06612
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.25 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2015
Abate by
Feb 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs,  debris was not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures:  JOBSITE:  Employees were operating power tools in work area where they were exposed to a tripping hazard from debris, such as (but not limited to) various pieces of lumber and wood were scattered about the ground.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2015
Abate by
Feb 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  JOBSITE:  The employee operating the DeWalt 10 inch Miter saw, underneath overhead work, was not wearing a protective hard hat.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.300 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2015
Abate by
Feb 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.300(b)(1): When power operated tools are designed to accommodate guards, they shall be equipped with such guards when in use.  JOBSITE:  The DeWalt Angle Grinder used by employees performing framing activities was not equipped with a guard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.304 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2015
Abate by
Feb 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.304(h)(1): Each circular crosscut table saw was not guarded by a hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw blade above the table and that portion of the saw above the material being cut:Note:  See paragraph (i)(1) of this section for additional requirements for hand-fed crosscut table saws.  JOBSITE:  The DeWalt 10 inch table saw used by employees to cut wood and lumber was not equipped with a guard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface having an unprotected side or edge which was six or more feet (1.8m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest system.  JOBSITE:  The employees performing framing activities at the mezzanine level of a commercial building were not protected from falling 10 ft. 10 inches to the lower level with guardrails, personal fall arrest systems or other equivalent means.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2015
Abate by
Feb 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  JOBSITE:  The employee installing siding while working on the steep sloped (6 in 12 pitched) roof was not protected from falling between 13 ft. 8 inches to 21 ft. 1inch to the ground with guardrails, personal fall arrest system or other equivalent means.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2015
Abate by
Mar 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:  JOBSITE:  The employees performing framing activities at the mezzanine level and exposed to the hazard of falling were not provided with training to recognize and minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2015
Abate by
Mar 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways:  JOBSITE:  The employee climbing up and down the Louisville 28 ft. aluminum extension ladder was not provided training as necessary to minimize hazards related to stairways.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS)  JOBSITE:  The horizontal distance of the base of the Louisville 28 ft. aluminum extension ladder to the vertical support was greater than one fourth (1/4) the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

View M.G. Flynn Contracting, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340072792.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.