STROMSBURG, NE —
OSHA Inspection: MIDWEST COVENANT HOME, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MIDWEST COVENANT HOME, INC. in 615 E. 9TH ST., STROMSBURG, NE 68666 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 340072933.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MIDWEST COVENANT HOME, INC.
- Site address
- 615 E. 9TH ST.
- City
- STROMSBURG
- State
- NE
- ZIP
- 68666
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 367, STROMSBURG, NE 68666
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 623110
- Employees
- 104
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Feb 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,060 · Current $3,060
017514702260
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered. Personal protective equipment including, but not limited to chemical impervious long gloves or arm sleeves were not used for employee exposure to liquid chemicals such as sodium hydroxide-based laundry detergent.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3060
- — Z (S) $3060
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Feb 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
017514702260
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment. Employer did not conduct a workplace assessment and select the proper personal protective equipment such as long chemical impervious gloves, impervious arm sleeves, face shields, and/or goggles for protection from hazardous liquid chemicals. A workplace hazard assessment was not available upon agency request.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Feb 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,060 · Current $0 Reduced
14702260
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors. Employees exposed to corrosive and/or toxic liquid chemicals such as hydrogen peroxide cleaners and sodium hydroxide-based laundry detergent did not wear protective goggles and/or face shields.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3060
1910.147 C05 I
- Issued
- Feb 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,825 · Current $3,060 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(i): Locks, tags, chains, wedges, key blocks, adapter pins, self-locking fasteners, or other hardware were not provided by the employer for isolating, securing or blocking of machines or equipment from energy sources. Energy control equipment such as locks and tags were not available for employees performing electrical maintenance including, but not limited to duplex outlet and ballast replacement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3060
- — Z (S) $3825
1910.1200 H03 III
- Issued
- Feb 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,060 · Current $3,060
017514702260
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii): Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer had implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used: Employee(s) exposed to corrosive chemicals including, but not limited to sodium hydroxide, hydrogen peroxide, and ammonium chlorides had not received appropriate chemical hazard training to ensure usage of the appropriate personal protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3060
- — Z (S) $3060
1910.1030 C01 IV B
- Issued
- Feb 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,060 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv)(B): The review and update of the exposure control plan did not document annually consideration and implementation of appropriate commercially available and effective safer medical devices designed to eliminate or minimize occupational exposure. Facility exposure control plan did not include annual documentation and review of effective safer medical devices. Documents indicated that this was last conducted in 2012.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3060
More inspections at Midwest Covenant Home, INC.
View Midwest Covenant Home, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 623110)
More inspections in NE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340072933.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.