BETHEL, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: PALADINES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PALADINES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC in 64-66 COPPER SQUARE, BETHEL, CT 06801 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340073295.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PALADINES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC
- Site address
- 64-66 COPPER SQUARE
- City
- BETHEL
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06801
- Mailing
- 255 MAIN ST. APT. 5, WEST HAVEN, CT 06516
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l). Worksite: The employee who was operating the Lull material handler was not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $960
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. Worksite: The employee who was framing wood stud walls with a pneumatic nail gun was not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $740 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws. Worksite: The outer sheathing of the flexible extension cord used by employees to power the Makita circular saw was pulled away from the fitting of the attachment plug.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $740
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b). Worksite: The employees who were working from the second story of the residence under construction at a height above six feet were not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1800
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards Worksite: The employees who were exposed to fall hazards while framing the residence under construction at a height above six feet were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Dec 4, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step. Worksite: An employee was not only working from but also using the top of the 6-foot stepladder in order to gain access to the top of the wall.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1800
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340073295.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.