FORT CALHOUN, NE ·
OSHA Inspection: QUINN SIDERS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of QUINN SIDERS in 319 N. 14TH ST., FORT CALHOUN, NE 68023 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 340073576.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- QUINN SIDERS
- Site address
- 319 N. 14TH ST.
- City
- FORT CALHOUN
- State
- NE
- ZIP
- 68023
- Mailing
- 3314 DECATUR ST., OMAHA, NE 68111
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Platform(s) on all working levels of scaffolds, were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and guardrail supports such that the space between adjacent units, and the space between the platform and the uprights is not fully planked: The employer is failing to protect employees from potential fall hazards associated with working from a scaffold platform less than 10 to the ground below. Employees were using a tubular framed scaffold which was not fully decked or planked at all working levels. This exposes the employees to potential fall hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $800
- · C (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: The employer is failing to protect employees from potential fall hazards associated with working from a scaffold platform. Employees were conducting work off of a tubular framed scaffold which is missing base plates and mudsills from the legs of the scaffold.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $800
- · C (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Workers were observed re-roofing the roof of a residential style construction site (house) not wearing harness or lanyard. The workers were exposed to falls of over 10 feet to sidewalk, dirt and stones below.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1400
- · C (S) $2800
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: The employer is failing to provide employees with adequate and effective fall protection training prior to allowing them to work on a residential style roof. This training would allow each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and allow them to understand the proper procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1000
- · C (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards by not ensuring that ladders being used on site extend 3 feet above the upper working surface. The employees are exposed to a fall from heights of greater than 9 feet to concrete below.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1400
- · C (S) $2800
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Employees had not been trained on the proper use of portable ladders. Multiple hazards involving the set-up and usage of the ladder on site were identified during the inspection. These hazards and the lack of training exposed the employees to a fall hazards in excess of 9 feet to the asphalt on this site.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $800
- · C (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in NE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340073576.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.