FOWLERTON, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: CORNELL SOLUTIONS
Fatality or catastrophe inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a fatality or catastrophe safety inspection of CORNELL SOLUTIONS in WASHBURN RANCH 01-06H, FOWLERTON, TX 78021 (NAICS 211111). OSHA activity number 340073857.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CORNELL SOLUTIONS
- Site address
- WASHBURN RANCH 01-06H
- City
- FOWLERTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78021
- Mailing
- 3145 CENTER POINTE DRIVE, EDINBURG, TX 78539
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Fatality or catastrophe (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 211111
- Employees
- 260
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 B06
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,183 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(b)(6): In locations where flammable vapors may be present, precautions were not taken to prevent ignition by eliminating or controlling sources of ignition: At this location, employees were exposed to fire and explosion hazards while performing oil and gas flow-back operations. The employer allowed: a) an Allmand Light/Power Plant, Model Night-Lite Pro II, which was not approved for the hazardous location; b) a Telehandler, JLG Model G9-43A, which was not approved for the hazardous location; c) a Rough Terrain Telehandler, Genie Model TT-TEREX-SBFL, which was not approved for the hazardous location; d) Torque wrench which was not approved for the hazardous location.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $7000
- · F (S) $4182.5
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.307 C03
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.307(c)(3): Equipment was not safe for the location in that it was not of a type and design that the employer demonstrated would provide protection from the hazards arising from the combustibility and flammability of vapors, liquids, gases, dusts, or fibers involved: At this location, employees were exposed to fire and explosion hazards while performing oil and gas flow-back operations. The employer allowed: a) an Allmand Light/Power Plant, Model Night-Lite Pro II, which was not approved for the hazardous location; b) a Telehandler, JLG Model G9-43A, which was not approved for the hazardous location; c) a Rough Terrain Telehandler, Genie Model TT-TEREX-SBFL, witch was not approved for the hazardous location.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $0
- · O (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,183 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: At this location, employees performing flow-back operation on well heads were exposed to chemical hazards associated with oil and gas wells. The employer did not identify nor evaluate hazards including but not limited to those of the vapors and gasses being released to atmosphere at the site.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $7000
- · F (S) $4182.5
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.151 B
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2015
- Abate by
- May 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,183 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(b): There was neither an infirmary, clinic, or hospital used for the treatment of all injured employees in near proximity to the workplace nor a person or persons adequately trained and equipped to render first aid: At this job site, for employees participating in flow back operations at washburn ranch well site 01-05H, 01-06H and 01-07H in this remote area where a fire occurred and employees were burned, the employer did not take appropriate steps prior to any accident to ascertain that emergency medical assistance or trained and equipped personnel would be promptly available when an injury occurs.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $7000
- · F (S) $4182.5
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.304 B04
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2015
- Abate by
- May 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,183 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(b)(4): Outlet devices did not have an ampere rating not less than the load to be served: At this job site, employees were permitted to utilize an electric torque wrench to remove and replace bolts on an oil and gas well blow out preventer and a wire-line blow out preventer. A torque wrench was plugged into an electrical outlet on a Night-Light Pro II Portable Light Tower. The electrical equipment used on the portable light tower electrical outlet exceeded the ampere rating of the outlet.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $7000
- · R (S) $4182.5
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.307 G02 I
- Issued
- Apr 23, 2015
- Abate by
- May 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $2,520 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.307(g)(2)(i): Locations were not classified depending on the properties of the flammable vapors, liquids, or gases that may be present and the likelihood that a flammable or combustible concentration or quantity is present. At this well site, employees were unbolting the wire line BOP from the frac valve using a torque machine and the actuator which was being energized by a light plant generator. Employees were working within as little as 2 feet of a well bore which was being depressurized and had flammable gas, mist, vapors coming from an open tank. The employer did not classify the work area and designate areas where electrical equipment could be used depending on the properties of the gases, vapors or other hazards that may have been present during this and other workplace operations.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $7000
- · F (S) $2520
- · Z (S) $7000
More inspections at Cornell Solutions
View Cornell Solutions's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 211111)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340073857.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.