Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: RICK HORN CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RICK HORN CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 53 NEWGATE ROAD, PITTSBURGH, PA 15202 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340074426.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rick Horn Construction, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rick Horn Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
53 NEWGATE ROAD
City
PITTSBURGH
State
PA
ZIP
15202
Mailing
933 STANTON AVENUE, PITTSBURGH, PA 15209
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.403 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1): The employer did not ensure that electrical equipment was free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:   a) Job site, 53 Newgate Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about November 5, 2014, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that electrical equipment was safe to use in that a multi-unit outlet device had a damaged outlet/plug.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.403 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification:   a) Job site, 53 Newgate Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about November 5, 2014, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that electrical equipment was properly used in that employees had a multi-unit plug device in use outdoors at the worksite, where it was labeled for use indoors in dry locations.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2014
Abate by
Nov 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:   a) Job site, 53 Newgate Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about November 5, 2014, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that an employee on the roof doing structural repair/carpentry/framing type work was using fall protection where exposed to fall hazards of approximately 10 feet.   a) Job site, 53 Newgate Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about November 5, 2014, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that an employee on the deck around the exterior of the house was using fall protection where exposed to fall hazards of approximately 8 1/2 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system, or on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width (see Appendix A to subpart M of this part), the use of a safety monitoring system alone:    a) Job site, 53 Newgate Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about November 5, 2014, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that employees applying ice guard materials to the roof were using fall protection where exposed to fall hazards of up to approximately 14 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2014
Abate by
Nov 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access; or, when such an extension was not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:   a) Job site, 53 Newgate Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about November 5, 2014, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that a ladder used to gain access to/egress from the roof was properly set up in that it extended approximately 2 1/2 feet above the roof line.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2014
Abate by
Dec 2, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record that contained the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer, or if the employer relied on training conducted by another employer or completed prior to the effective date of this section, the certification record did not indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training:   a) Job site, 53 Newgate Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about November 5, 2014, during construction activities, the employer did not ensure that fall protection training records existed for all employees.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

View Rick Horn Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340074426.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.