Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: ARBOR METALS LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ARBOR METALS LLC in 811 REGAL ROW, DALLAS, TX 75247 (NAICS 423510). OSHA activity number 340077502.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Arbor Metals LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Arbor Metals LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ARBOR METALS LLC
Site address
811 REGAL ROW
City
DALLAS
State
TX
ZIP
75247
Mailing
811 REGAL ROW, DALLAS, TX 75247
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423510
Employees
42
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 6 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2015
Abate by
Feb 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:     The employer failed to ensure procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy:       a) This violation occurred on November 5, 2014 at a workplace located at: 811 Regal Row Dallas, TX 75247 where the employer did not develop, document and utilized a specific procedure for the 24 inch Stanat Slitter machine when performing preproduction setup to ensure the employees are properly locking out all energy sources to the 24 inch Stanat Slitter machine when performing this service work;     b) This violation occurred on November 13, 2014 at a workplace located at: 811 Regal Row Dallas, TX 75247 where the employer did not develop, document and utilized a specific procedure for the 24 inch Yoder machine when performing preproduction setup to ensure the employees are properly locking out all energy sources to the 24 inch Yoder machine when performing this service work;       c) This violation occurred on November 13, 2014 at a workplace located at: 811 Regal Row Dallas, TX 75247 where the employer did not develop, document and utilized a specific procedure for the 48 inch Proeco machine when performing preproduction setup to ensure the employees are properly locking out all energy sources to the 48 inch Proeco machine when performing this service work;     d) This violation occurred on November 13, 2014 at a workplace located at: 811 Regal Row Dallas, TX 75247 where the employer did not develop, document and utilized a specific procedure for the 36 inch Stanat Slitter machine when performing preproduction setup to ensure the employees are properly locking out all energy sources to the 36 inch Stanat Slitter machine when performing this service work;       e) This violation occurred on November 13, 2014 at a workplace located at: 811 Regal Row Dallas, TX 75247 where the employer did not develop, document and utilized a specific procedure for the 24 inch Paxton machine when performing preproduction setup to ensure the employees are properly locking out all energy sources to the 24 inch Paxton machine when performing this service work;     f) This violation occurred on November 13, 2014 at a workplace located at: 811 Regal Row Dallas, TX 75247 where the employer did not develop, document and utilized a specific procedure for the 48 inch Wean machine when performing preproduction setup to ensure the employees are properly locking out all energy sources to the 48 inch Wean machine when performing this service work.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2400
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 6 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2015
Abate by
Apr 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:      The employer failed to ensure that adequate machine guarding was provided to protect operators and other employees from caught-in-between and struck by hazards from the points of operation:      a) This violation occurred on November 5, 2014 at a workplace located at: 811 Regal Row Dallas, TX 75247; where a machine operator was operating the 24 inch Stanat Slitter machine. The employer failed to ensure appropriate guards were on the coiler and recoiler spoils;    b) This violation occurred on November 13, 2014 at a workplace located at: 811 Regal Row Dallas, TX 75247; where a machine operator was operating the 24 inch Yoder machine. The employer failed to ensure appropriate guards were on the coiler and recoiler spoils;    c) This violation occurred on November 13, 2014 at a workplace located at: 811 Regal Row Dallas, TX 75247; where a machine operator was operating the 36 inch Stanat Slitter machine. The employer failed to ensure appropriate guards were on the coiler and recoiler spoils;    d) This violation occurred on November 13, 2014 at a workplace located at: 811 Regal Row Dallas, TX 75247; where a machine operator was operating the 48 inch Proeco machine. The employer failed to ensure appropriate guards were on the coiler and recoiler spoils;    e) This violation occurred on November 13, 2014 at a workplace located at: 811 Regal Row Dallas, TX 75247; where a machine operator was operating the 24 inch Paxton machine. The employer failed to ensure appropriate guards were on the coiler and recoiler spoils;    f)This violation occurred on November 13, 2014 at a workplace located at: 811 Regal Row Dallas, TX 75247; where a machine operator was operating the 48 inch Wean machine. The employer failed to ensure appropriate guards were on the coiler and recoiler spoils.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2400
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.219 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 9, 2015
Abate by
Feb 5, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting:     The employer failed to ensure that horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely to protect operators and other employees from caught-in-between and struck by hazards:       a) This violation occurred on November 5, 2014 at a workplace located at: 811 Regal Row Dallas, TX 75247; where a machine operator was operating the 24 inch Slitter Stannat machine. The employer failed to ensure appropriate employees were protected from horizontal shafting employees were exposed to caught-in-between and struck by hazards;     b) This violation occurred on November 5, 2014 at a workplace located at: 811 Regal Row Dallas, TX 75247; where a machine operator was operating the 36 inch Slitter Stannat machine. The employer failed to ensure appropriate employees were protected from horizontal shafting employees were exposed to caught-in-between and struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340077502.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.