Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RICELAND CABINET CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RICELAND CABINET CORPORATION in 326 N. HILLCREST ROAD BLDG. A, WOOSTER, OH 44691 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 340079326.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Riceland Cabinet Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Riceland Cabinet Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
326 N. HILLCREST ROAD BLDG. A
City
WOOSTER
State
OH
ZIP
44691
Mailing
326 N. HILLCREST ROAD BLDG. A, WOOSTER, OH 44691
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337110
Employees
92
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): On every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked on plates of approved design and securely affixed in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate.    On or about November 12, 2014 the employer did not ensure that the supervisor's office on the north side of the  workroom floor was load rated and that loads approved by the building official was marked on a plate and posted in a conspicuous place on the office.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 92 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Abate by
Feb 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:    On or about November 12, 2014 the employer failed to keep all exit routes free and unobstructed including but not limited to:      a. The two exit routes in the countertop fabrication area were obstructed by canvas tarps.     b. The emergency exit door on the north east side of the workroom floor was blocked by materials and equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.106 E06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Abate by
Feb 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(i): Adequate precautions were not taken to prevent the ignition of flammable vapors:     On or about November 12, 2014 the employer did not did not take adequate precautions to prevent the ignition of flammable vapors when it improperly used a Gyro Mixer model number 28988 to mix flammable liquids in the finishing area. The mixer could possibly expose the flammable material to frictional heat; static; and electrical or mechanical sparks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Abate by
Feb 25, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, and flying chips.    On or about November 12, 2014 the employer failed to guard the mini-press machine on the west side if the building around its rotating parts to prevent flying chips and sparks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.213 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Abate by
Feb 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(d)(1): Each circular crosscut table saw shall be guarded by a hood which shall meet all the requirements of paragraph (c)(1) of this section for hoods for circular ripsaws.    On or about November 12, 2014 the employer failed to guard the table saw in the countertop fabrication area at the south end of the building.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.303 G01 I B

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Abate by
Feb 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i)(B): For electric equipment operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, and likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized, the width of the working space in front of electrical equipment was less than the width of the equipment or 762 mm (30 inches), whichever was greater :    On or about November 12, 2014 the employer failed to keep the required 30 inches in front of two electrical panels on the workroom clear to allow at least a 90 degree opening of equipment doors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.305 B02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Abate by
Feb 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose:    On or about November 12, 2014 the employer failed to cover the electrical junction box in the com finishing area with a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2015
Abate by
Feb 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer.  On or about November 12, 2014 the employer did not ensure that the employees that were voluntarily using respirators had been issued the information contained in Appendix D.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Riceland Cabinet Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340079326.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.