Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: VALETIN SALAZAR ROOFING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VALETIN SALAZAR ROOFING in 23910 IH 10 WEST, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78257 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340080605.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Valetin Salazar Roofing for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Valetin Salazar Roofing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
23910 IH 10 WEST
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78257
Mailing
474 HEIDEN REICH, KYLE, TX 78640
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   On the roof of a residential apartment building under construction, west side, on or about November 13, 2014, employees without fall protection were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6 feet to the unpaved ground below, while repairing shingles on a roof with a pitch of 6:12.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  On the roof of a residential apartment building under construction, south side, on or about November 13, 2014, employees were exposed to a fall hazard when using a portable ladder that was not 3 feet above the upper landing surface to gain access to a roof.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2015
Abate by
Jan 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On the roof of a residential apartment building under construction, west side, on or about November 13, 2014, employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6 feet to the unpaved ground below, while not being trained on the procedures to recognize fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2015
Abate by
Jan 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:  On the roof of a residential apartment building under construction, south side, on or about November 13, 2014, employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6 feet to the unpaved ground below, while using a ladder that was not 3 feet above the upper landing surface and not being trained on ladder hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340080605.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.