DES PLAINES, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: GDN ENTERPRISES, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GDN ENTERPRISES, INC. in 1052 MARGRET, DES PLAINES, IL 60016 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340081140.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GDN ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Site address
- 1052 MARGRET
- City
- DES PLAINES
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60016
- Mailing
- 3940 N. NOTTINGHAM AVE., CHICAGO, IL 60634
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Mar 31, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: a) Employees were not wearing protective helmets where there was a possible danger of head injury. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Mar 31, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means: a) Employees were not protected against accidental contact with energized overhead power lines during roofing work. The overhead power lines consisted of secondary lines having a voltage rating of 120/240 volts. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 31, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) Employees engaged in roofing activity were not protected from fall hazards while working at an elevation of approximately 19 feet above the ground. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1900
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Mar 31, 2015
- Abate by
- May 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: a) Employer did not provide training to each employee in order to recognize hazards associated with working at an elevation and to understand procedures to control or minimize those hazards. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Mar 31, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: a) Ladders used by employees to gain access to the working surface did not have its side rails extended at least three feet above the surface. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340081140.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.