OSHA Inspection: ORA AT MELBOURNE BEACH, INC.

Issued

Feb 10, 2015

Abate by

Mar 30, 2015

Penalty

Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a. Pool area - the employer did not have a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to chemical products such as, but not limited to muriatic acid and chlorine. Violation observed on or about 11/14/14.

Issued

Feb 10, 2015

Abate by

Mar 30, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a. Pool area - the employer did not provide hazard communication training for employees exposed to chemical products such as, but not limited to muriatic acid and chlorine. Violation observed on or about 11/14/14.

Issued

Feb 10, 2015

Abate by

Mar 30, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  a. Pool area - the employer did not provide the information contained in Appendix D when respirator use was voluntary.  Violation observed on or about 11/14/14.

Issued

Feb 10, 2015

Abate by

Mar 30, 2015

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:  a. Pool area - the employer did not provide a medical evaluation when an AO Safety elastomeric respirator was used.  Violation observed on or about 11/14/14.