PEORIA, IL —
OSHA Inspection: USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. in 801 SW JEFFERSON, PEORIA, IL 61605 (NAICS 336390). OSHA activity number 340084961.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Site address
- 801 SW JEFFERSON
- City
- PEORIA
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61605
- Mailing
- 801 SW JEFFERSON, PEORIA, IL 61605
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336390
- Employees
- 80
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $700
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer did not certify to OSHA that the cited violation had been abated: On April 30, 2015, USQA Technologies, Inc., was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through written certification that each citation was abated. Abatement certification was not received for the following violations: a. Citation 1 Item 1a & b, and b. Citation 1 Item 2, and c. Citation 1 Item 4a & b.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $700
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2015
- Abate by
- May 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment: Employees working throughout the facility were exposed to hazards associated with welding, the operation press machines and other tools and equipment and the employer had not certified that a workplace hazard assessment had been completed.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.138 B
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2015
- Abate by
- May 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(b): The employer did not base selection of appropriate hand protection on an evaluation of the performance characteristics of the hand protection relative to the tasks to be performed, conditions present, duration of use, and the hazards and potential hazards identified: Employees operating the robotic welding stations are exposed to hand burns because the non-insulated cotton gloves provided by the employer are not adequate to handle hot metal parts.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2015
- Abate by
- May 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: A metal receptacle box with knockouts was attached to flexible cable to provide electricity to a portable fan used in front of the Accord robot welding station. The metal boxes were not used according to their listing/labeling requirements.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed. Employees operating the Civic robotic welding machine were exposed to electric shock hazards because the outlet box powering the fans had a missing knockout.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2015
- Abate by
- May 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: The employer did not ensure that labels were affixed to in-plant containers of hazardous chemicals. There were containers with different types of oils used for the operation of the presses, manual and robotic welding and other equipment and the containers did not have labels with the identity of the chemical in the containers.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2015
- Abate by
- May 19, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: The employer did not ensure that labels were affixed to in-plant containers of hazardous chemicals with the appropriate hazard warnings. There were containers with different types of oils used for the operation of the presses, manual and robotic welding and other equipment and the containers did not have labels with appropriate hazard warnings for the chemical contained in the containers.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- Apr 30, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer: Employees working in the robotic welding area were voluntarily provided with disposable nuisance dust masks and the employer did not provide them with the information contained in Appendix D of the Respiratory Protection Standard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at USA Technologies, INC.
View USA Technologies, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336390)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340084961.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.