SHIPPENSBURG, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: HARI RAM NAM INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HARI RAM NAM INC in 125 WALNUT BOTTOM ROAD, SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 340093525.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HARI RAM NAM INC
- Site address
- 125 WALNUT BOTTOM ROAD
- City
- SHIPPENSBURG
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 17257
- Mailing
- 125 WALNUT BOTTOM ROAD, SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 721110
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01 I
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): The employer did not select and have each affected employee use, the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee(s) from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment: (a) FACILITY WIDE - Employees performed daily duties to include cleaning and pool maintenance, and the employer did not ensure that employees were provided with personal protective equipment while using products, including but not limited to Muriatic Acid, Pool Lift Turbo Shock, and Ecolab Stainblaster Power Paks, thereby exposing employees to serious injuries, on or about November 7, 2014. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: (a) FACILITY WIDE - Employees performed daily duties to include cleaning and pool maintenance, and the employer did not ensure that employees were not required to use eye protection while using products, including but not limited to Muriatic Acid, Pool Lift Turbo Shock, and Sodium Hypochlorite, thereby exposing employees to serious injuries, on or about November 7, 2014. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: (a) SWIMMING POOL ROOM - Employee(s) used multiple chemicals to maintain the swimming pool, including muriatic acid, Pool Life Turbo Shock, and Sodium Hypochlorite, and there were no facilities suitable for flushing and drenching of the eyes, thereby exposing employee(s) to serious injury, on or about November 7, 2014. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) FACILITY WIDE - Employees used products including, but not limited to Muriatic Acid, Alkaline Rise, Pool Lift Turbo Shock, and multiple Ecolab products including Stainblaster Power Paks, and the employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program, thereby exposing employees to serious injury, on or about October 30, 2014. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Dec 18, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: (a) FACILITY WIDE - The employer had not completed the workplace hazard assessment, and had not certified that it had been completed, on or about November 7, 2014. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $200
- · Z (O) $400
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 721110)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340093525.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.