Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: HARI RAM NAM INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HARI RAM NAM INC in 125 WALNUT BOTTOM ROAD, SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 340093525.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hari RAM NAM INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hari RAM NAM INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HARI RAM NAM INC
Site address
125 WALNUT BOTTOM ROAD
City
SHIPPENSBURG
State
PA
ZIP
17257
Mailing
125 WALNUT BOTTOM ROAD, SHIPPENSBURG, PA 17257
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
721110
Employees
12
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2014
Abate by
Jan 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): The employer did not select and have each affected employee use, the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee(s) from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment:    (a)  FACILITY WIDE - Employees performed daily duties to include cleaning and pool maintenance, and the employer did not ensure that employees were provided with personal protective equipment while using products, including but not limited to Muriatic Acid, Pool Lift Turbo Shock, and Ecolab Stainblaster Power Paks, thereby exposing employees to serious injuries, on or about November 7, 2014.    Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.133 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2014
Abate by
Jan 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:  (a)  FACILITY WIDE - Employees performed daily duties to include cleaning and pool maintenance, and the employer did not ensure that employees were not required to use eye protection while using products, including but not limited to Muriatic Acid, Pool Lift Turbo Shock, and Sodium Hypochlorite, thereby exposing employees to serious injuries, on or about November 7, 2014.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2014
Abate by
Jan 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    (a)  SWIMMING POOL ROOM - Employee(s) used multiple chemicals to maintain the swimming pool, including muriatic acid, Pool Life Turbo Shock, and Sodium Hypochlorite, and there were no facilities suitable for flushing and drenching of the eyes, thereby exposing employee(s) to serious injury, on or about November 7, 2014.    Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2014
Abate by
Jan 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a)  FACILITY WIDE - Employees used products including, but not limited to Muriatic Acid, Alkaline Rise, Pool Lift Turbo Shock, and multiple Ecolab products including Stainblaster Power Paks, and the employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program, thereby exposing employees to serious injury, on or about October 30, 2014.    Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Dec 18, 2014
Abate by
Feb 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:    (a) FACILITY WIDE - The employer had not completed the workplace hazard assessment, and had not certified that it had been completed, on or about November 7, 2014.    Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $200
  • · Z (O) $400

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340093525.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.