Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: A.J.F. QUALITY CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of A.J.F. QUALITY CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 8130 W. JUDGE PEREZ, CHALMETTE, LA 70043 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 340095223.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A.J.F. Quality Construction, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A.J.F. Quality Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8130 W. JUDGE PEREZ
City
CHALMETTE
State
LA
ZIP
70043
Mailing
2756 MOUNT LAYREL DR., GRETNA, LA 70054
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.300 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2015
Abate by
Jan 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.300(c): Employees using hand and power tools and exposed to the hazard of falling, flying, abrasive, or splashing objects, or exposed to harmful dusts, fumes, mists, vapors, or gases were not provided with the particular personal protective equipment:   a) 8130 W. Judge Perez Rd., Chalmette, LA; On or about 11/18/2014, the employer allowed an employee to operate a Makita hand grinder to cut brick while not wearing a face shield for protection from the flying debris.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.303 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2015
Abate by
Jan 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.303(b)(1): Grinding machines were not equipped with safety guards in conformance with the requirements of ANSI B7.1-1970, Safety Code for the Use, Care, and Protection of abrasive wheels, and paragraph (d) of this section.    a) 8130 W. Judge Perez, Chalmette, LA; On or about 11/18/14, the employer allowed an employee to operate a Makita hand grinder to cut brick while missing the guard.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii)   a) 8130 W. Judge Perez Rd., Chalmette, LA; On or about 11/18/14, the employer allowed employees to work from a scaffold level that was not fully planked. The employees were 18 feet above the ground.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 12 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2015
Abate by
Jan 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:   a) 8130 W. Judge Perez Rd., Chalmette, LA; On or about 11/18/14, the employer allowed employees to work from a scaffold without base plates installed to provide the required support.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2015
Abate by
Jan 21, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.   a) 8130 W. Judge Perez, Chalmette, LA; On or about 11/18/14, the employer allowed employees to access and egress a scaffold for masonry purposes while not having a ladder attached.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.   a) 8130 W. Judge Perez Rd., Chalmette, LA; On or about 11/18/14, the employer did not ensure that employees working from a scaffold 18 feet above the ground were protected by a complete guardrail system.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340095223.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.