Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: ARMSTRONG RELOCATION COMPANY OHIO LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ARMSTRONG RELOCATION COMPANY OHIO LLC in 3359 BRUENING AVE SW, CANTON, OH 44706 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 340096536.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Armstrong Relocation Company Ohio LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Armstrong Relocation Company Ohio LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3359 BRUENING AVE SW
City
CANTON
State
OH
ZIP
44706
Mailing
3359 BRUENING AVE SW, CANTON, OH 44706
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493110
Employees
11
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.157 E02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2014
Abate by
Dec 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:  On or about November 21, 2014, the employer did not have ABC fire extinguishers located throughout the warehouse visually inspected monthly.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $840
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2014
Abate by
Dec 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:  On or about November 21, 2014, the employer did not provide annual training on portable fire extinguishers when available for employee use.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2014
Abate by
Dec 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  On or about November 21, 2014, the employer had not trained or evaluated employees who drive powered industrial trucks on a daily basis.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1120
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2014
Abate by
Dec 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about November 21, 2014, the company did not develop a written hazard communication program at the site. Employees are working with hazardous chemicals such as propane and hydraulic oil.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $840
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2014
Abate by
Dec 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about November 21, 2014, the employer did not provide training or information to employees working with hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to; propane and hydraulic oil.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:   On or about November 21, 2014, the workplace hazard assessment had not been put in writing and certified with the person conducting the evaluation and the dates the hazard assessment was completed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.178 Q07

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2014
Abate by
Dec 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  On or about November 21, 2014, the employer did not inspect the Propane Toyota  SN#81097 and Propane Mitsubishi SN#AF-628 on a daily basis before being placed in service.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340096536.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.