OLD ORCHARD BEACH, ME —
OSHA Inspection: KEVIN BEDARD BUILDING CONTRACTOR
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KEVIN BEDARD BUILDING CONTRACTOR in 196 EAST GRAND AVENUE, OLD ORCHARD BEACH, ME 04064 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 340097526.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KEVIN BEDARD BUILDING CONTRACTOR
- Site address
- 196 EAST GRAND AVENUE
- City
- OLD ORCHARD BEACH
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04064
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 481, BIDDEFORD, ME 04005
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236115
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Mar 3, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. At the jobsite - The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent 02/09/2015.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Job Site - In the following instances employees were not protected from falling: a) While working on the deck in the front of the house. b) While working on the second floor near the stairway floor openings. c) While working on the second floor near the window wall openings.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1052 C01 II
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: Job Site - The stairway between the first and the second floors was not equipped with a railing on the unprotected side.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections at Kevin Bedard Building Contractor
View Kevin Bedard Building Contractor's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236115)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340097526.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.