Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALLIED METALS, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ALLIED METALS, LLC in 2902 NW 32ND AVE, MIAMI, FL 33142 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 340097542.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Allied Metals, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Allied Metals, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ALLIED METALS, LLC
Site address
2902 NW 32ND AVE
City
MIAMI
State
FL
ZIP
33142
Mailing
2902 NW 32ND AVE, MIAMI, FL 33142
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423930
Employees
35
Ownership type
A

15 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 35 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards: Note: Toeboards are only required when persons can pass, there is moving equipment or there is equipment with which falling materials could create a hazard.    a.) On or about April 8, 2015, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while working from a loading dock that was more than 4 feet that was not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3150
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy.     a.)  On or about January 7, 2015, at the above addressed jobsite, the energy control procedures for the balers provided by the employer were not specific as they did not contain specific information specified in the standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3150
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    a.)  On or about January 7, 2015, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not conduct a periodic inspection at least annually to ensure that the energy control procedures and the requirements of this standard were being followed to secure two baling machines which were being maintained by employees who had not de energized and locked the electrical disconnect panel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3150
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.147 D02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(2): The machine or equipment was not turned off or shut down using the procedures established for the machine or equipment by the manufacturer:    a.)  On or about January 7, 2015, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure that energy isolating devices such as electrical disconnects, locks and tags, were used in such a manner to isolate the electrical energy source on two baling machines that employees had maintained and had not de energized and locked the electrical disconnect panel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3150
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.147 D04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees:  a.)  On or about January 7, 2015, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure that locks and tags were used by authorized employees to secure electrical power at disconnect panels on two baling machines that employees had been maintaining and had not de energized and locked the electrical disconnect panel before maintaining or clearing jams.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 D06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(6): Prior to starting work on machines or equipment that had been locked out or tagged out, the authorized employee did not verify that isolation and deenergization of the machine or equipment had been accomplished:  a.)   On or about January 7, 2015, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure that authorized employees had verified that the electrical power had been isolated and de energized on two baling machines that employees had been maintaining and had not de energized and locked the electrical disconnect panel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a.)  On or about April 8, 2015, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to amputation hazards while operating the Canton Fdy & Massey Co. metal shear that lacked point of operation guard at the cutting blades.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2250
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:    a)  On or about January 7, 2015, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to struck by and cut by hazards while using a bench grinder whose work rests were in excess of one half inch from the grinding surface of the wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2250
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel.    a)  On or about January 7, 2015, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to struck by and cut by hazards while using a bench grinder whose tongue guards were in excess of one half inch from the grinding surface of the wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2250
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.219 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft:    a.)  On or about April 8, 2015, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to caught in between hazards while operating the Canton Fdy & Massey Co. metal shear that had an exposed rotating shaft on the drive motor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2250
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.219 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1): Gear(s) were not guarded by a complete enclosure or by one of the methods specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1)(ii) and (f)(1)(iii):    a.)  On or about April 8, 2015, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to caught-in between hazards while operating a the Canton Fdy & Massey Co. metal shear that had exposed spur gears that were not enclosed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2250
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.303 G02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating  at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i):    a.) On or about January 7, 2015, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to 440 VAC electrocution hazards while operating a disconnect switch inside the energized IPS baler control panel within close proximity to energized conductors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3150
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.303 C03 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(c)(3)(i): All splices and joints and the free ends of the conductors were not covered with an insulation equivalent to that of the conductors or with an insulating device identified for the purpose.    a.) On or about April 8, 2015, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to shock and electrocution while using the Dayton pedestal fan that had a spliced 110 VAC electrical power cord.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.305 B02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose:  a.) On or about April 8, 2015, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to shock and electrocution hazards while working in proximity to the IPS Baler which had a junction box that was energized with 110 VAC that lacked a cover.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.305 G02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2015
Abate by
Jun 1, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables shall be connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided that will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws.  a.) On or about April 8, 2015, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to shock and electrocution hazard while using the Canton Fdy & Massey Co. metal shear that had a 220 VAC flexible cord that had a plug that had damaged outer jacket insulation and lacked strain relief.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Allied Metals, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340097542.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.