MIAMI, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: NEXT DOOR COMPANY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NEXT DOOR COMPANY in 1300 NW 74TH STREET, MIAMI, FL 33147 (NAICS 332321). OSHA activity number 340103860.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NEXT DOOR COMPANY
- Site address
- 1300 NW 74TH STREET
- City
- MIAMI
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33147
- Mailing
- 1300 NW 74TH STREET, MIAMI, FL 33147
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332321
- Employees
- 27
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- May 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: On or about November 25, 2014 at the above addressed job site, employer did not establish or implement an energy control program describing energy control procedures, employee training and periodic equipment inspection for employees performing maintenance or servicing of equipment, such as but not limited to Amada HFE 220-4S press break, AccurPress 71008 press break, Di-Acro press break and Strippit hole puncher; exposing employees to caught by and caught in hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2940
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- May 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a. On or about November 25, 2014 at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to caught by hazards while working with a press brakes such as Amada HFE 220-4S, AccurPress 71008 and Di-Acro press brake without point of operation guarding and/or alternate measures that provide effective protection. b. On or about November 25, 2014 at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to caught by hazards while working with Strippit hole puncher that lacked a guard on its point of operation. c. On or about November 25, 2014 at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to caught by hazards while working with Jet vertical band saw that lacked guarding for the unused portion of the cutting blade.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2940
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- May 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer: On or about November 25, 2014 at the above addressed worksite, employer did not provide employees that voluntarily wearing Body Guard HY8812 N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirator with the information contained in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about November 25, 2014 at the above addressed job site, the employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program describing hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to; DEGABOND 55 2, Magic Solution for the Boss and Sherwin-Williams Water-Reducible primer for employees performing metal door manufacturing operations.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332321)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340103860.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.