Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: VENCO GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LLC

Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of VENCO GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LLC in 7853 S. OLYMPIA AVE., TULSA, OK 74132 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 340105279.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Venco General Construction LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Venco General Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7853 S. OLYMPIA AVE.
City
TULSA
State
OK
ZIP
74132
Mailing
1402 N. SHERIDAN ROAD, TULSA, OK 74115
Inspection type
Programmed Related (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
20
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 5, 2014
Abate by
Dec 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:     Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated.  On or about November 25, 2014, and at times prior there to, employees were observed not wearing a body harness with lanyard while working from an aerial lift.  The employees were exposed to a fall hazard.    OSHA recognizes that a body belt is not sufficient and the use of a full body harness is required.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340105279.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.