MIDDLETOWN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: PEGASUS MANUFACTURING, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PEGASUS MANUFACTURING, INC. in 422 TIMBER RIDGE ROAD, MIDDLETOWN, CT 06457 (NAICS 336411). OSHA activity number 340107523.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PEGASUS MANUFACTURING, INC.
- Site address
- 422 TIMBER RIDGE ROAD
- City
- MIDDLETOWN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06457
- Mailing
- 422 TIMBER RIDGE ROAD, MIDDLETOWN, CT 06457
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336411
- Employees
- 80
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures shall be developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section. WORKSHOP: The hazardous energy control lockout/tagout procedures were generic and not written step-by-step in machine specifics for the employees during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as ( but limited to) the CNC milling machines, lathes, and bending machines.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer shall provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees. WORKSHOP: The employees, as "authorized, affected and/or other" types were not provided with training and information in the controlling of potentially hazardous and unexpected releases of energy sources (lo/to) during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the CNC milling machines, lathes, and bending machines.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc. WORKSHOP: The ingoing nip point, created by the lower pulley and the belt of the Stephen Badger Co., deburring machine was unguarded. ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.213 B03
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(b)(3): On applications where injury to the operator might result if motors were to restart after power failures, provision shall be made to prevent machines from automatically restarting upon restoration of power. WORKSHOP: The Wermatic III table saw was not equipped a magnetic starter. ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.219 C02 I
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed parts of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform, excepting runways used exclusively for oiling, or running adjustments, shall be protected by a stationary casing enclosing shafting completely or by a trough enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting as location requires. The horizontal shafts of the equipment in the following locations were unguarded: A. Tool Room: The horizontal shaft of the Niigata mill was unguarded. ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION. B. Brazing Department: 1. The horizontal shafts of the Bridgeport Safety Emery Wheel were unguarded. 2. The horizontal shafts of the New Britain Machine were unguarded. ABOVE ITEMS WERE ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.219 C04 I
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Projecting shaft ends. Projecting shaft ends shall present a smooth edge and end and shall not project more than one-half the diameter of the shaft unless guarded by nonrotating caps or safety sleeves: The horizontal shaft ends and nuts of the equipment in the following locations were unguarded: A. Tool Room: Both end nuts of the Baldor grinder/buffer were unguarded. ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION. B. Brazing Department: 1. The right end nut of the Bridgeport Safety Emery Wheel was unguarded. 2. The horizontal shaft ends/nuts of the New Britain Machine were unguarded. 3. Polishing wheel, unknown identification; end nuts unguarded. ABOVE ITEMS WERE ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazards are present, or likely to be present. WORKSHOP: The employer had not assessed the workplace to determine the necessitate and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for the employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Pegasus Manufacturing, INC.
View Pegasus Manufacturing, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336411)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340107523.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.