CRESSKILL, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: OTTO SALAZAR, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of OTTO SALAZAR, INC. in 113 JACKSON DRIVE, CRESSKILL, NJ 07626 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340112283.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- OTTO SALAZAR, INC.
- Site address
- 113 JACKSON DRIVE
- City
- CRESSKILL
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07626
- Mailing
- 108 SOUTH VALLEY ROAD, LINCOLN PARK, NJ 07035
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,320 · Current $660 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: A) Upper level - An employee was exposed to head injuries while working below framing activities. The employee was not protected by a hard hat or protective helmet, on or about November 12th, 2014.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $660
- — Z (S) $1320
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,760 · Current $880 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: A) Top of structure: Employees were exposed to eye/face injuries while using pneumatic nail guns and were not protected with any type of eye/face protection, on or about November 12th, 2014.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $880
- — Z (S) $1760
1926.501 B02 II
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,760 · Current $880 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(2)(ii): Each employee on a walking/working surface six feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level where leading edges were under construction, but who was not engaged in the leading edge work, was not protected from falling by a guardrail system or other type of any other type of fall protection. A) Second level of structure: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 12 feet while engaged in framing work on a residential structure without a means of fall protection in place, on or about November 12th, 2014.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $880
- — Z (S) $1760
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,640 · Current $1,320 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step: A) Upper level of structure: Employees were exposed to fall/ladder collapse hazards as they were using the top steps of an 8 foot folding step ladder, on or about November 12th, 2014.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1320
- — Z (S) $2640
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $15,400 · Current $7,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b) A) Top of structure: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 22 feet while engaged in framing work on a residential structure without a means of fall protection in place, on or about November 12th, 2014. Otto Salazar, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 949148, citation number 2, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on February 13th, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at 245 Pershing Road in Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $7700
- — Z (R) $15400
More inspections at Otto Salazar, INC.
View Otto Salazar, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340112283.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.