Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: FLORENTINO RUIZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FLORENTINO RUIZ in 4387 LIPPENCOT LANE, KENNESAW, GA 30144 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 340119601.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Florentino Ruiz for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Florentino Ruiz is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FLORENTINO RUIZ
Site address
4387 LIPPENCOT LANE
City
KENNESAW
State
GA
ZIP
30144
Mailing
1298 EAST RIDGE RD, GAINESVILLE, GA 30501
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.28 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions.  (a) 4387 Lippencot Lane, Acworth, GA: The employer exposed employees to eye injuries while operating pneumatic nail guns,  and circular saws, in that; no protective eyewear was being worn.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $960
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.304 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.304(d): Each portable, power-driven circular saw withdrawn from the work did not automatically and instantly return the lower guard to the covering position of the saw.  (a) 4387 Lippencot Lane, Acworth, GA: An employee was exposed to lacerations while operating a Makita, Model 5007F, circular saw that had its lower guard defeated and could not return to its covering position when withdrawn from the work.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $960
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 B02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2)(i): Each ladder jack scaffold, top plate bracket scaffold, roof bracket scaffold, and pump jack scaffold was not at least 12 inches (30 cm) wide:    a) 4387 Lippencot Lane, Acworth, GA: An employee was exposed to a lower level fall hazard of approximately 12 - 1/2 feet while working from a ladder jack scaffold platform, in that; the platform was approximately 7 ¼ inches in width.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system:  a) 4387 Lippencot Lane, Acworth, GA: An employee was exposed to a lower level fall hazard of approximately 12- 1/2 feet while working from a ladder jack scaffold platform.  The employee was not utilizing a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a) 4387 Lippencot Lane, Acworth, GA: An employee was exposed to a lower level fall hazard of approximately 13 feet while working from the roof of a porch.  The employee was not using any means of approved fall protection.1
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340119601.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.