Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: KITCHEN CONTRACTING, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KITCHEN CONTRACTING, LLC in HUDDLE HOUSE CONSTRUCTION CORVETTE DRIVE, LITCHFIELD, IL 62056 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 340120195.

Watch Kitchen Contracting, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kitchen Contracting, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
HUDDLE HOUSE CONSTRUCTION CORVETTE DRIVE
City
LITCHFIELD
State
IL
ZIP
62056
Mailing
5509 CRESCENT DRIVE, HILLSBORO, MO 63050
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l) and as referenced by the note contained in 1926.602(d):    The employer did not ensure that employees who were operating a JCB - 507-42 fork loader had successfully completed a training program.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2000
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):  The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:      The employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to establish criteria for protecting employees from fall from heights hazards and struck by hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2000
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):  The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):      The employer did not maintain jobsite inspections that were performed by a person competent to ensure employees were not exposed to falling and struck-by injuries during commercial construction operations.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2000
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:      The employer did not ensure that employees were trained to control or eliminate head injury hazards from falling objects.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2000
  • — I (S) $2240
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:      Head protective equipment was not used when employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while working under and handing material up to workers on a higher level.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2800
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 C02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts were used to support scaffold platforms while the entire platform was not attached to the fork and the fork-lift was moved horizontally while the platform was occupied:    A wooden pallet was used as a scaffold platform and was set on the forks on a JCB - 507-42 fork loader.  The employees stood on the scaffold platform on the forks while it was moved horizontally to reach working height.  This exposed employees to the hazard of falling 15 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2800
  • — I (S) $2240
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:     The employer did not ensure fall protection such as guardrails was implemented for employees who were working on a job-made elevated work platform.  Employees were exposed to the hazard of falling approximately fifteen (15) feet.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2800
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.602 C01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii): Modifications or additions affecting the safe operation of the equipment were made without the manufacturer's written approval:       The employer did not obtain written approval from the manufacturer when using a wooden pallet as a scaffold platform on a forklift.  The scaffold platform was set on the forks of a forklift and used to raise employees to the upper working area.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (O) $2000
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340120195.