BROKEN ARROW, OK ·
OSHA Inspection: ALFA LAVAL INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ALFA LAVAL INC. in 1201 S. 9TH STREET, BROKEN ARROW, OK 74012 (NAICS 332410). OSHA activity number 340122803.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALFA LAVAL INC.
- Site address
- 1201 S. 9TH STREET
- City
- BROKEN ARROW
- State
- OK
- ZIP
- 74012
- Mailing
- 1201 S. 9TH STREET, BROKEN ARROW, OK 74012
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332410
- Employees
- 250
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
30 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm, including severe burns, to employees in that employees were exposed to dust explosion, deflagration, or other fire hazards from combustible dust associated with the metalizing process: The employer does not ensure engineering controls are in place to minimize the escape of combustible dust. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014 and at times prior there to, in the Metalizing Booth. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation describing the steps that is taking to engineering controls are in place to minimize escape of combustible dust.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $5000
- · C (S) $7000
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.106 D04 I
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,600 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(4)(i): Inside storage rooms were not constructed to meet the required fire-resistive rating for their use. Such construction did not comply with the test specifications set forth in Standard Methods of Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, NFPA 251-1969. The employer does not ensure the inside paint storage room is constructed to meet the fire-resistive rating for their use. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees are exposed to hazards associated with fire. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure inside paint storage room is constructed to meet the required fire-resistive rating for their use.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $5000
- · C (S) $6600
- · Z (S) $6600
1910.106 D04 II
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(4)(ii): Storage in inside storage rooms shall comply with Table H-13. The employer does not ensure paint storage inside the storage room at the old paint booth is in compliance with Table H-13. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees are exposed to hazards associated with fire and explosion. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure paint storage inside the storage room is in compliance with Table H-13.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.106 D04 IV
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(4)(iv): Every inside storage room was not provided with either a gravity or a mechanical exhaust ventilation system: The employer does not ensure the paint storage area is provided with ventilation. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees are exposed to hazards associated with fire and explosion. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure every inside storage room will be provided with either a gravity or a mechanical exhaust ventilation system.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.106 D04 V
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(4)(v): In every inside storage room there shall be maintained one (1) clear aisle at least three (3) feet wide. The employer does not ensure an aisle at least three (3) feet wide is maintained in the paint storage room. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, in the paint storage room where employees are exposed to hazards associated with fire. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure in every inside storage room there is one (1) clear aisle at least three (3) feet wide maintained.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.107 B02
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $4,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(2): The interior surfaces of spray booths were not smooth and continuous without edges and otherwise designed to prevent pocketing of residues and facilitate cleaning and washing without injury: The employer does not ensure the walls of the metalizing booth are smooth and continuous. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees spray flammable paints daily in the booth and are exposed to hazards associated with fire. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure the walls of the metalizing booth are smooth and continuous.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $4000
- · C (S) $5500
- · Z (S) $5500
1910.107 E02
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- May 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(e)(2): The quantity of flammable liquids or liquids with a flashpoint greater than 199.4 degrees F (93 degrees C) kept in the vicinity of spraying operations exceeded a supply for one day or one shift: The employer allows more than one days supply of flammable liquids to be stored in the vicinity of spraying operations. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees spray flammable paints daily. Employees are exposed to hazards associated with fire and explosion. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure the quantity of paint kept in the vicinity of spraying operations is kept to one days supply.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.107 B05 IV
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- May 26, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(iv): Space within the spray booth on the downstream and upstream sides of filters were not protected with approved automatic sprinklers: The employer does not ensure the downstream side of the filters of the west exhaust unit in the old spray booth is protected by approved automatic sprinklers. This violation was observed on or about February 4, 2015, where employees are exposed to hazards associated with fire and explosion. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure downstream side of the filters of the west exhaust unit within the old spray booth is protected by approved automatic sprinklers.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $5000
- · C (S) $7000
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.107 F03
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- May 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(f)(3): Sprinklers protecting spraying areas were not kept as free from deposits as practical by cleaning daily if necessary: The employer does not ensure the sprinkler for the fire suppression system behind the filters covering the west exhaust fan in the old paint booth is kept clean. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees spray flammable paints daily. Employees are exposed to hazards associated with fire and explosion. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure fire sprinklers in paint booths are kept clean.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.107 C02
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(2): Open flame or spark producing equipment was within a spraying area and/or within 20 feet thereof, was not separated by a partition: The employer does not ensure open flames and spark producing equipment are not used in or within 20 feet of any spraying area. Employees are exposed to hazards associated with fire and explosion. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, at the following locations: a) Open flame infrared heaters are used in the metalizing booth. b) Open flame salamander heaters are used in the metalizing booth. c) Open flame infrared heaters are used in the old paint booth. d) Open flame infrared heaters are used within 8 to 10 feet of the old paint booth. e) Spark producing equipment is used within 8 to 10 feet of the old paint booth. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure open flames or spark producing equipment is not used in or within 20 feet of a spray area or booth.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $5000
- · C (S) $7000
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.107 G02
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(2): All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary: The employer does not ensure combustible residues in spraying areas do not accumulate. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees are exposed to hazards associated with fire and explosion. a) Combustible residue is allowed to collect on the floor of the old paint booth. b) Combustible residue is allowed to collect on the walls of the old paint booth. c) In the old paint booth combustible residue is allowed to collect inside the west exhaust fan unit on the floor of the metal housing for the unit. d) Combustible residue is allowed to collect on equipment and structure inside both the east and west exhaust fan units in the old paint booth. e) Combustible residue is allowed to collect on the floor of the metalizing booth. f) Combustible residue is allowed to collect on the walls of the metalizing booth. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure residue is not allowed to accumulate.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.107 C05
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $4,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(5): Electrical equipment not approved for locations containing both deposits of readily ignitable residues and explosive vapors was present in spraying area(s): The employer allows electrical wiring and equipment to be in an area subject to deposits of ignitable residue and explosive vapors. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees in the metalizing booth are exposed to hazards associated with fire and explosion. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure electrical in spray areas or booths is intrinsically safe.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $4000
- · C (S) $5500
- · Z (S) $5500
1910.107 G01
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- May 26, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $5,500 · Current $4,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(1): Spraying was conducted outside of predetermined spraying areas. The employer does not ensure spraying is not conducted outside of predetermined spraying areas. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, where employees spray flammable paints in the facility. Employees are exposed to hazards associated with fire and explosion and hazards associated with chemicals. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure employees do not spray outside predetermined areas.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $4000
- · C (S) $5500
- · Z (S) $5500
1910.134 D03 III B 2
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,600 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(3)(iii)(B)(2): The employer did not implement a change schedule for respirators not equipped with an End of Service Life Indicator that would ensure cartridges were changed before the end of their service life: The employer does not implement a change schedule for respirator cartridges used by employees spraying paints. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees spray paints. Employees are exposed to hazards associated with chemicals. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure a cartridge change schedule is implemented.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $5000
- · C (S) $6600
- · Z (S) $6600
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,600 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece is used, and at least annually thereafter: The employer does not ensure all employees receive a respiratory protection fit test. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees spray flammable paints, abrasive blast and metalize daily. Employees are exposed to hazards associated with chemicals. a) Two employees in the metalizing booth have not received respiratory protection fit tests. b) Employees in the paint booth have not received a respiratory protection fit test for wearing full face respiratory protection. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure employees receive the required respiratory protection fit test.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $5000
- · C (S) $6600
- · Z (S) $6600
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- May 26, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: The employer allows employees to wear a tight-fitting respirator while having facial hair that comes between the sealing surface and the face. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees are exposed to hazards associated with chemicals. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure employees do not have facial hair that interferes with the face to face piece seal.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 H01 I
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- May 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,600 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1)(i): Respirators issued for the exclusive use of an employee were not cleaned and disinfected as often as necessary to be maintained in a sanitary condition: The employer does not ensure respiratory protection is cleaned as often as necessary to be maintained in a sanitary condition. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees are exposed to hazards associated with chemicals. a) Respiratory protection used by employees in the paint department is not kept clean. b) Employees in the paint department use acetone or paint thinner to remove paint residue from the inside and outside of respiratory protection Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure respirators are kept clean.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $5000
- · C (S) $6600
- · Z (S) $6600
1910.134 H02 I
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve: The employer allows employees to store respirators in areas not protected from contamination and damaging chemicals. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees spray flammable paints daily. Employees are exposed to hazards associated with chemicals. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure respirators are properly stored.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 I07
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- May 26, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(7): Oil lubricated compressor(s) used to supply breathing air did not have a high-temperature or carbon monoxide alarm(s) or both: The employer does not ensure the carbon monoxide monitors for the supplied air systems used in the metalizing and abrasive blasting areas are functioning properly. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees are exposed to hazards associated with carbon monoxide. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure carbon monoxide monitors remain in operation.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $5000
- · C (S) $7000
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee can demonstrate knowledge of items in (i)-(vii): The employer does not ensure employees can demonstrate the knowledge contained in items (i)-(vii) where employees are not trained or are provided inadequate training. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees spray flammable paints, abrasive blast and metalize using zinc daily. Employees are exposed to hazards associated with chemicals. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure employees receive adequate respiratory protection training.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $5000
- · C (S) $7000
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.141 G02
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.141(g)(2): Employees were allowed to consume food or beverages in an area exposed to a toxic material: The employer does not ensure employees did not consume food or beverages in areas exposed to toxic materials. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees spray flammable paints daily, weld and grind aluminum, carbon and stainless steel, abrasive blast and metalize using zinc. Employees are exposed to hazards associated with chemicals. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure employees are provided a place to eat and drink and ensure employees do not eat and drink in work areas.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $5000
- · C (S) $7000
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.141 G04
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Dec 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.141(g)(4): Food or beverages were stored in area(s) exposed to toxic material(s): The employer does not ensure employees did not store food in areas exposed to toxic materials. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees spray flammable paints daily, weld and grind carbon and stainless steel, abrasive blast and metalize using zinc. Employees are exposed to hazards associated with chemicals. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure employees are provided a place to store food and drink and are not allowed to store them in work areas.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,600 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: The employer does not provide facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes or body. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees spray corrosive paints daily. Employees are exposed to hazards associated with chemicals. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure an eyewash is provided in each area where employees are exposed to corrosives.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $5000
- · C (S) $6600
- · Z (S) $6600
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer does not implement at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training are met: The employer does not implement the companys written hazard communication program. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees spray flammable paints daily, weld and grind aluminum and carbon and stainless steel, abrasive blast and metalize using zinc. Employees were exposed to the hazard of contact with hazardous materials such as, but not limited to silica, chromium (VI), copper fume, manganese fume, nickel, metal and insoluble compounds, zinc oxide fume, iron oxide fume and chromium, metal and insoluble salts as well as paints and thinner containing hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, hexamethylene diisocyanate, hexamethylene diisocyanate homopolymer, n-Butyl Acetate and 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene, ethyl benzene and toluene. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure the walls of the metalizing booth are smooth and continuous.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $5000
- · C (S) $7000
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- May 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which includes a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that is referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet: The employer does not maintain a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present in the workplace. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees spray flammable paints daily, weld and grind aluminum, carbon and stainless steel, abrasive blast and metalize using zinc. Employees are exposed to hazards associated with chemicals. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure a current chemical list is maintained as a part of the hazard communication program.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- May 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s): The employer does not ensure safety data sheets (SDS) are readily available to all employees. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees spray flammable paints daily, weld and grind aluminum, carbon and stainless steel, abrasive blast and metalize using zinc. Employees are exposed to hazards associated with chemicals. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure the Safety Data Sheets are readily accessible to all employees.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: The employer does not provide training to employees which includes an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the safety data sheets, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees spray flammable paints daily, weld and grind aluminum, carbon and stainless steel, abrasive blast and metalize using zinc. Employees are exposed to hazards associated with chemicals. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure the hazard communication program is implemented.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1026 L01 III
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1)(iii): The employer did not include chromium (VI) in the hazard communication program, established to comply with the Hazard Communication Standard, 29 CFR 1910.1200, ensure that each employee had access to labels on containers of chromium (VI) and to safety data sheets, and was trained in accordance with the requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard and 29 CFR 1910.1026: The employer does not: a) Include chromium (VI) in the hazard communication program b) Provide each employee access to the safety data sheets c) Provide each employee training in accordance to the requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard and paragraph (l)(2) of this section. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014 where employees weld and grind stainless steel. Employees are exposed to the hazard of contact with chromium (VI). Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure chromium (VI) is included in the hazard communication program, ensure employees have access to safety data sheets and provide each employee with necessary training.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $33,000 · Current $23,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: The employer does not provide a written respiratory protection program with required worksite specific procedures and elements for required respirator use. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees spray flammable paints daily, abrasive blast using silica sand and metal beads and metalize using zinc. Employees are exposed to the hazards associated with chemicals. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure employees receive effective training in hazard communication. Alfa Laval, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.134(c), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 242695, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on May 7, 2012, with respect to a workplace located at 321 Foster Avenue, Wood Dale, IL 60191.
Recent events (3)
- · F (R) $23000
- · C (R) $33000
- · Z (R) $33000
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- May 22, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 3, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $38,500 · Current $27,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: The employer does not provide effective information and training to employees exposed to hazardous chemicals in the workplace. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees spray flammable paints daily, metalize using zinc creating a combustible dust, weld and grind carbon and stainless steel and abrasive blast using silica sand and metal shot. Employees are exposed to hazards associated with chemicals. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure employees receive effective training in hazard communication. Alfa Laval, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 242695, citation number 2, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on May 7, 2012, with respect to a workplace located at 321 Foster Avenue, Wood Dale, IL 60191.
Recent events (3)
- · F (R) $27000
- · C (R) $38500
- · Z (R) $38500
More inspections at Alfa Laval INC.
View Alfa Laval INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332410)
More inspections in OK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340122803.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.