MILWAUKEE, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: BRAD ROZANSKI
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BRAD ROZANSKI in 7338 GOOD HOPE RD., MILWAUKEE, WI 53222 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 340124338.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BRAD ROZANSKI
- Site address
- 7338 GOOD HOPE RD.
- City
- MILWAUKEE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53222
- Mailing
- 5231 WOOD LILY LANE, WATERFORD, WI 53185
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238990
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: a) No certification of abatement was received for the following items: 1) Citation 1, Item 1: The employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection. 2) Citation 1, Item 2: Employees did not have means of access and egress from breaks in elevation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $400
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. (a) The employer did not ensure that an employee was using fall protection, exposing an employee to fall hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1200
- · C (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Dec 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: (a) The employer did not ensure that an employee had a means of access and egress for a break in elevation greater than 19 inches, exposing the employee to fall hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340124338.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.