Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FT JAMES

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of FT JAMES in 215 N. STANTON, EL PASO, TX 79901 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 340125145.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch FT James — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for FT James is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FT JAMES
Site address
215 N. STANTON
City
EL PASO
State
TX
ZIP
79901
Mailing
700 W PAISANO, EL PASO, TX 79901
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.62 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2015
Abate by
Apr 22, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): The employer did not initially determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level.  On October 24, 2014 and times prior, the general contractor did not initially determine if employees working on their site may have been exposed to paint containing 6.8 percent lead. This condition exposed employees to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.1101 D05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2015
Abate by
Apr 16, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(d)(5): The general contractor did not ascertain whether the contractor was in compliance with this standard and/or require the contractor to come into compliance with this standard when necessary.  On October 24, 2014, and times prior to, the general contractor did not ascertain whether it subcontractors were in compliance with the asbestos standard. Subcontractor employee were working in areas with un-abated asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440
  • — Z (S) $2400

View FT James's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340125145.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.