Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: D. Z. FRANCO CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of D. Z. FRANCO CONSTRUCTION, LLC in ROSEMERE DRIVE, CONROE, TX 77304 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340133594.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch D. Z. Franco Construction, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for D. Z. Franco Construction, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
ROSEMERE DRIVE
City
CONROE
State
TX
ZIP
77304
Mailing
11511 CROOKED PINE DR, CYPRESS, TX 77429
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2015
Abate by
Jan 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   The employer does not protect employees from falling when working 6 feet or more above a lower level. This violation was observed on or about December 10, 2014, where 6 employees were exposed to a 20 foot fall hazard when installing roofing material on a steep pitched roof without a fall protection system.   Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees are protected from falling when exposed to falls 6 feet or more above a lower level.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2015
Abate by
Jan 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:  The employer does not use ladders where the side rails extend as least 3 feet above the upper landing surface. This violation was observed on or about December 10, 2014, where employees were exposed to a 9 foot fall hazard when using an extension ladder to access a roof without the ladder extending at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.   Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that portable ladders that are used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2015
Abate by
Jan 26, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the foot and the top support).  The employer does not use ladders where the angle is such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder is approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder. This violation was observed on or about December 10, 2014, where employees were exposed to a 9 foot fall hazard when using an extension ladder to access a roof without the ladder being used at angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that non-self-supporting ladder(s) are used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder is approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the foot and the top support).
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340133594.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.