WASHINGTON, PA —
OSHA Inspection: SHERWOOD VALVE LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SHERWOOD VALVE LLC in 2200 NORTH MAIN STREET, WASHINGTON, PA 15301 (NAICS 332919). OSHA activity number 340134857.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SHERWOOD VALVE LLC
- Site address
- 2200 NORTH MAIN STREET
- City
- WASHINGTON
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 15301
- Mailing
- 2200 NORTH MAIN STREET, WASHINGTON, PA 15301
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332919
- Employees
- 112
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $4,590 · Current $1,148 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicates that any employee's exposure may equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: a) In the Small Ball Valve area, on or about February 19, 2015 - Employee operated the automated Lincoln Electric Arc welder and grinder equipment. Employee full shift monitoring resulted in 69% of the permissible daily noise dose (8-hour time weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or equivalent sound level of approximately 87.4 dBA, during the 406 minute sampling period. The sampling did not include 25 minutes of noise exposure. The employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1148
- — Z (S) $4590
1910.95 I02
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(i)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that hearing protectors are worn by any employee who is exposed to an 8-hour time weighted average of 85 decibels or greater: a) In the Small Ball Valve area, on or about February 19, 2015 - Employee operated the automated Lincoln Electric Arc welder and grinder equipment. Employee full shift monitoring resulted in 69% of the permissible daily noise dose (8-hour time weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or equivalent sound level of approximately 87.4 dBA, during the 406 minute sampling period. The sampling did not include 25 minutes of noise exposure. The employer did not ensure employees wore hearing protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01 I
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,060 · Current $1,147 Reduced
1591BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures. The program was not updated as necessary to reflect those changes in workplace conditions that affect respirator use. The employer did not include in the program the procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace: a) Facility, On or about December 9, 2014 - The "Respiratory Protection Program - Sherwood Valve, Washington, PA," excluded procedures employees will use in selecting respirators while performing non-routine tasks such as but not limited to: cleaning the scrubber (dust collector) attached to the welder systems collecting the lead and metal dust and debris then disposing of the hazardous waste.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1147
- — Z (S) $3060
1910.134 D01 IV
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iv): The employer did not select respirators from a sufficient number of respirator models and sizes so that the respirator is acceptable to, and correctly fits, the user: a) Facility, On or about December 9, 2014 - In the ball valve area where respirators were required by the employer, the employer did not select respirators from a sufficient number of respirator models and sizes. Employees used air purifying respirator while performing non-routine tasks such as but not limited to: cleaning the scrubber (dust collector)attached to the welder systems collecting the lead and metal dust and debris then disposing of the hazardous waste. The employer requires employees to wear half-mask tight-fitting respirators during this task.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1025 H01
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,060 · Current $3,060
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: a) Facility, On or about February 19, 2015 - Wipe samples from the work surface indicated lead contamination detected on the work surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3060
- — Z (S) $3060
1910.1025 L01 I
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(i): Each employer who has a workplace in which there is a potential exposure to airborne lead at any level shall inform employees of the content of Appendices A and B of this regulation: a) Ball Valve Area, On or about February 19, 2015 - Ball valve operators were not informed on the contents of the lead standard's Appendices A and B.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1025 L01 II
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not train each employee who is subject to exposure to lead at or above the action level, or for whom the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists, in accordance with the requirements of this section. The employer did not institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program: a) Ball Valve Area, On or about February 19, 2015 - Ball valve operators were not trained in accordance with the requirements of the lead standard and based on an instituted training program which ensured employee participation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment: a) Facility, On or about February 19, 2015 - A written hazard assessment was not documented and certified that it was performed for the ball valve department where assembly, welders and buffing employees were exposed to metal dust and debris which necessitated personal protective equipment such as face, hand and arm protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not maintain a written hazard communication program which included a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that is referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet (the list may be compiled for the workplace as a whole or for individual work areas): a) Facility, On or about December 9, 2014 - The section (4) titled Hazard Communications of the Sherwood Valve LLC Safety Rules and Regulations excluded a chemical inventory list.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01 II
- Issued
- May 26, 2015
- Abate by
- Jul 17, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(ii): The employer did not maintain a written hazard communication program which included the methods the employer will use to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks (for example, the cleaning of reactor vessels): a) Facility, On or about December 9, 2014 - The section (4) titled Hazard Communications of the Sherwood Valve LLC Safety Rules and Regulations excluded methods the employer will inform employees of the hazards associated with non-routine tasks such as but not limited to: cleaning the scrubber (dust collector) attached to the welder systems collecting metal containing dust and debris from operation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Sherwood Valve LLC
View Sherwood Valve LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332919)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340134857.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.