Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: GALLIHER & HUGUELY ASSOCIATES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GALLIHER & HUGUELY ASSOCIATES, INC. in 5925 BLAIR ROAD, NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20011 (NAICS 444110). OSHA activity number 340136225.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Galliher & Huguely Associates, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Galliher & Huguely Associates, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5925 BLAIR ROAD, NW
City
WASHINGTON
State
DC
ZIP
20011
Mailing
5925 BLAIR ROAD, NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20011
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
444110
Employees
30
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2015
Abate by
Feb 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,842 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section 5(a)(1): The employer did not furnish a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of getting caught-in or between a tipping forklift and the ground:    a) Lumber Yard - An employee was observed operating a Hyster forklift, model number 100, and not using the provided seat belt, on or about 12/11/2014.    Abatement certification and documentation required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, the date and method of abatement, and state that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement. Abatement documentation shall include documents demonstrating that abatement is complete, such as evidence of the purchase or repair of equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2842
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2015
Abate by
Feb 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,030 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment:    a) Upper Warehouse - An assessment was not performed where employees were using a Delta radial arm saw to cut wood to size and not wearing eye protection, on or about 12/11/2014.    Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2030
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:  a) Upper Warehouse - Employees were cutting wood to size with a Delta radial arm saw, model number 438-02-314-2067 and not wearing eye protection, on or about 12/11/2014.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.176 G

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2015
Abate by
Feb 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,842 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.176(g): Covers and/or guardrails were not provided to protect personnel from the hazards of open ditches:    a) Rear Warehouse Access  - A ditch next to the access road used by employees to gain entry to a warehouse and road was not guarded to prevent powered industrial trucks from rolling into the ditch, on or about 12/11/2014.    Abatement certification and documentation required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, the date and method of abatement, and state that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement. Abatement documentation shall include documents demonstrating that abatement is complete, such as evidence of the purchase or repair of equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2842
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.178 L01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2015
Abate by
Feb 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1): The employer did not ensure that each power industrial truck operator was competent to operate a power industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in paragraph (1):  a) Upper Warehouse - An employee was operating a Mitsubishi powered industrial truck, model number FGK20K, serial number AF82C-01136, to lift bundles of Homasote and had not completed certification powered industrial truck training, on or about 12/11/2014.  b) Lumber Yard - An employee was operating a Hyster powered industrial truck, model number 101, to lift material and had not completed certification powered industrial truck training, on or about 12/11/2014.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 A06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2015
Abate by
Feb 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were in place:  a) Lumber Yard - An employee was operating a Hyster powered industrial truck, model number 101 and the nomenclature plate was missing, on or about 12/11/2014.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2015
Abate by
Mar 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:  a) Lumber Yard - The employer had not developed a written hazard communication program where employees were filling powered industrial trucks with diesel fuel on or about 12/11/2014.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2015
Abate by
Mar 9, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   a) Lumber Yard - The employer had not trained employees working with diesel fuel on or about 12/11/2014.  Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Galliher & Huguely Associates, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340136225.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.