Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HALE-MILLS CONSTRUCTION, LTD.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HALE-MILLS CONSTRUCTION, LTD. in 817 CHESTNUT ST, SAN MARCOS, TX 78666 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 340143718.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hale-Mills Construction, LTD. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hale-Mills Construction, LTD. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
817 CHESTNUT ST
City
SAN MARCOS
State
TX
ZIP
78666
Mailing
3700 BUFFALO SPEEDWAY SUITE 1100, HOUSTON, TX 77098
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236116
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.403 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2015
Abate by
Mar 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification.  On or about December 16, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that the yellow Romex electrical cable was installed in accordance with listing and labeling in that the cable was not protected by a rigid metal conduit or otherwise protected from physical damage, exposing employees to the hazard of electrical shock.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2100

1926.405 G01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2015
Abate by
Mar 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(1)(ii): Flexible cord was not equipped with an attachment plug and energized from a receptacle outlet when used as permitted in 29 CFR 1926.405(g)(1)(i) [C], [F], or [H]:  On or about December 16, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the orange 25 foot extension cord had the plug end cut off and was hard wired into the 110 volt job made electrical distribution panel, exposing employees to the hazard of electrical shock.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2015
Abate by
Mar 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  On or about December 16, 2014, and at times prior thereto, strain relief devices were not provided on the following pieces of electrical equipment creating an electrical and fire hazard at the construction site:  a. The 220 volt job made electrical distribution panel TB #1, located in the parking garage next to the base of the tower crane.  b.The 110 volt job made electrical distribution panel the orange extension cord hard wired into the box located on the second floor.  c. The 110 volt 25 foot orange extension cord plugged into the light site located on the 3rd floor.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2015
Abate by
Mar 31, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  On or about December 16, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure each employee working on the edge of the court yard balcony was protected from falling more than 6 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3500

View Hale-Mills Construction, LTD.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340143718.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.