Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: RUDY THE ROOFER, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RUDY THE ROOFER, INC. in 510 HALSEY LANE, BRIDGEHAMPTON, NY 11932 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340144401.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rudy the Roofer, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rudy the Roofer, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
510 HALSEY LANE
City
BRIDGEHAMPTON
State
NY
ZIP
11932
Mailing
30 EASY ST., SAYVILLE, NY 11782
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2015
Abate by
Jun 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    a) Worksite, 510 Halsey Lane, Bridgehampton, NY- Employees were not wearing head protection directly below tools and materials overhead; on or about 12/12/2014.    Note:  The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    a) Worksite, 510 Halsey Ave., Bridgehampton, NY - Employees using a pneumatic nail gun to install roofing shingles were not using eye protection; on or about 12/15/14.    Note:   Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2015
Abate by
Jun 17, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     a) Worksite, 510 Halsey Ave., Bridgehampton, NY- Employees were installing roofing materials while standing several inches from the roof edge at a height of approximately 22' above the ground below. The employees were working without fall protection; on or about 12/12/14.    Note:  In addition to abatement certification the employer is required to submit abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2000
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to upper landing surfaces, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladders were used to gain access.    a) Worksite, 510 Halsey Ave., Bridgehampton, NY, back roof of residence- Employee was using an extension  ladder to access the back, west-facing roof of the residence. The ladder side rails did not extend beyond the roof upper landing surface; on or about 12/15/2014.     Note:   Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340144401.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.