Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: GEORGIA PAIN PHYSICIANS

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GEORGIA PAIN PHYSICIANS in 313 BOYNTON DRIVE, RINGGOLD, GA 30736 (NAICS 621111). OSHA activity number 340145309.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Georgia Pain Physicians for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Georgia Pain Physicians is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
313 BOYNTON DRIVE
City
RINGGOLD
State
GA
ZIP
30736
Mailing
2550 WINDY HILL RD. SUITE 206, MARIETTA, GA 30067
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621111
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2015
Abate by
Jun 19, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500

Hazardous substances 1631

29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition.  All places of employment were not kept clean following mercury spills of ¼ pound from a W. A. Baum Co. Baumanometer® sphygmomanometer on November 14 and December 17, 2014.  Bulk samples were taken that demonstrated the presence of 32.3750 and 42,925.00 micrograms of mercury on Patient Room 2 floor which indicates improper cleaning of the areas.    a) Patient Room 2; The employer required employees to work in the patient room while accumulations of mercury were on the floor.  Bulk samples from the floor were collected on December 17, 2014 revealing 32.3750 and 42,925.00µg of mercury present.  b) Administrative Area; The employer required employees to work in the administrative area while accumulations of mercury were on the floor.  Mercury was observed on the floor of the Administrative Area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3500
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.120 Q01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2015
Abate by
Jul 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1631

29 CFR 1910.120(q)(1): The employer did not develop and implement an emergency response plan to handle anticipated emergencies prior to commencement of emergency response operations:   The employer failed to develop or implement an emergency response plan following mercury spills of ¼ pound from a W. A. Baum Co. Baumanometer® sphygmomanometer on November 14  and December 17, 2014.      a) Patient Room 2 and Administrative Area; On November 14, 2014 the employer required employees to clean up accumulations of mercury in Patient Room 2 and the Administrative Area that were spilled from a sphygmomanometer without developing and implementing an emergency response plan.  b) Patient Room 2 and Administrative Area; On December 10, 2014 the employer required employees to clean up accumulations of mercury in Patient Room 2 and the Administrative Area that were spilled from a sphygmomanometer without developing and implementing an emergency response plan.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4200

1910.120 Q06 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2015
Abate by
Jul 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1631

29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(i): First responders at the awareness level did not have sufficient training or have sufficient experience to objectively demonstrate competency in the areas covered by 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(i)(A) through (q)(6)(i)(F):  The employer failed to provide first responders sufficient training to handle mercury spills of ¼ pound from a W. A. Baum Co. Baumanometer® sphygmomanometer on November 14  and December 17, 2014.       a) Patient Room 2 and Administrative Area; On November 14, 2014 the employer failed to develop and implement a training program for individuals who are likely to witness or discover a hazardous substance release such as, but not limited to mercury.  b) Patient Room 2 and Administrative Area; On December 10, 2014 the employer failed to develop and implement a training program for individuals who are likely to witness or discover a hazardous substance release such as, but not limited to mercury.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4200

1910.120 Q06 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2015
Abate by
Jul 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1631

29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(ii): First responders at the operational level did not receive at least eight hours of training or did not have sufficient experience to objectively demonstrate competency in the areas required by 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(ii)(A) through (q)(6)(ii)(F) and/or the employer did not so certify:   The employer failed to develop and implement a training program for individuals who are likely to respond to a hazardous substance release such as, but not limited to mercury by containing the release from a safe distance.  The Lab Supervisor informed an employee that mercury was dangerous and taped up the door to Patient Room 2 to prevent employee exposure, but failed to completely isolate the room by sealing up the ventilation system.  Employees were exposed to mercury vapor.       a) Patient Room 2 and Administrative Area; On November 14, 2014 the employer failed to develop and implement a training program for individuals who are likely to respond to a hazardous substance release such as, but not limited to mercury by containing the release from a safe distance.  b) Patient Room 2 and Administrative Area; On December 10, 2014 the employer failed to develop and implement a training program for individuals who are likely to respond to a hazardous substance release such as, but not limited to mercury by containing the release from a safe distance.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.120 Q06 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2015
Abate by
Jul 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1631

29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(iii): Employees who participated as hazardous materials technicians, or were expected to participate as hazardous materials technicians, had not received at least 24 hours of training equal to the first responder operations level, and in addition have competency in the areas outlined in 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(iii)(A) through (q)(6)(iii)(I) and/or the employer did not so certify:    The employer failed to develop and implement a training program for individuals who are likely to respond to a hazardous substance release such as, but not limited to mercury by stopping and/or cleaning up the spill.  A Medical Assistant, Office Manager, and Regional Operations Manager were required to clean up ¼ pound of mercury from Patient Room 2 and the Administrative Area.        a) Patient Room 2 and Administrative Area; On November 14, 2014 the employer failed to develop and implement a training program for individuals who are likely to respond to a hazardous substance release such as, but not limited to mercury by stopping and/or cleaning up the spill.    b) Patient Room 2 and Administrative Area; On December 10, 2014 the employer failed to develop and implement a training program for individuals who are likely to respond to a hazardous substance release such as, but not limited to mercury by stopping and/or cleaning up the spill.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.120 Q11 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2015
Abate by
Jul 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $900 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1631

29 CFR 1910.120(q)(11)(ii): Where cleanup was done on plant property using plant or workplace employees, such employees had not completed the training requirements of 29 CFR 1910.38(a), 1910.134, 1910.1200, and other appropriate safety and health training made necessary by the task they were expected to perform such as personal protective equipment and decontamination procedures:      The employer failed to ensure that employees cleaning up a hazardous substance release such as, but not limited to mercury  had completed training requirements and other appropriate safety and health training necessary.  A Medical Assistant, Office Manager, and Regional Operations Manager were required to clean up ¼ pound of mercury from Patient Room 2 and the Administrative Area prior to receiving training on appropriate personal protective equipment, cleanup procedures, or the hazards of mercury.    a) Patient Room 2 and Administrative Area; On November 14, 2014 the employer required employees to clean up accumulations of mercury in Patient Room 2 and the Administrative Area that were spilled from a sphygmomanometer prior to being trained.    b) Patient Room 2 and Administrative Area; On December 10, 2014 the employer required employees to clean up accumulations of mercury in Patient Room 2 and the Administrative Area that were spilled from a sphygmomanometer prior to being trained.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $900
  • · Z (S) $4200

1904.40 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $700
29 CFR 1904.40(a): The employer did not provide an authorized government representative the records within the four business hours.  a) On or about December 17, 2014, the employer failed to provide copies of the OSHA 300 log to the CSHO within four hours of the request.  Seven employees were added to the OSHA 300 form log on November 14 and December 10, 2014 due to a mercury spill in the establishment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $700
  • · Z (O) $700

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340145309.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.