HYANNIS, MA —
OSHA Inspection: I'M CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of I'M CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 195 RIDGEWOOD AVENUE, HYANNIS, MA 02601 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340150333.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- I'M CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- 195 RIDGEWOOD AVENUE
- City
- HYANNIS
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02601
- Mailing
- 83 NORTH PRECINCT ROAD, CENTERVILLE, MA 02632
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.300 C
- Issued
- Feb 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.300(c): Employees using hand and power tools and exposed to the hazard of falling, flying, abrasive, or splashing objects, or exposed to harmful dusts, fumes, mists, vapors, or gases were not provided with the particular personal protective equipment necessary to protect them from the hazard. All personal protective equipment did not meet the requirements nor was it maintained according to subparts D and E of this part: Jobsite: Employees were performing roofing operations on a roof with two different levels using pneumatic nail guns without the use of eye protection exposing employees to being struck-by falling or flying objects.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Feb 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system. Jobsite: Three employees were engaged in roofing activities on a low-slope roof without the use of guardrails, safety nets, warning lines, personal fall arrest systems, or safety monitor exposing them to a fall of approximately 10 feet to the pavement below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.502 A02
- Issued
- Feb 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(a)(2): The employer did not provide and install all fall protection systems required by this subpart for employee(s) and did not comply with all other pertinent requirements of this subpart before employee(s) began the work that necessitates the fall protection. Jobsite: The employer did not provide and install fall protection systems required by this subpart exposing employees to falls of approximately 10 feet to the pavement below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Feb 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: Employees were not provided training in the recognition of fall hazards or the procedures to follow in order to minimize those hazards while working on a low-sloped roof where they are exposed to fall hazards of approximately 10 feet to the pavement below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A02
- Issued
- Feb 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii): Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that employees were trained by a competent person where they were exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Feb 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. Jobsite: The employer did not develop a written record and certification of employee fall protection training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Feb 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Jobsite: A portable aluminum extension ladder that was used to access the roof from the ground did not extend at least 3 feet above the roof being accessed exposing employees to falls of approximately 10 feet to the pavement below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B07
- Issued
- Feb 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(7): Ladder(s) that were unsecured or not provided with slip-resistant feet were used on slippery surfaces: Jobsite: Employees were using an aluminum extension ladder without slip-resistant feet on a slippery surface to access the roof above exposing employees to falls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Feb 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 15, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: Jobsite: Peak of lower roof, a fiberglass folding step ladder, approximately 6 feet in height, was in the closed position almost vertical, leaning against the rain gutter of the roof above and being used to access the upper roof from the lower roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2800
More inspections at I'M Construction, INC.
View I'M Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340150333.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.