BIDDEFORD, ME ·
OSHA Inspection: AL GAUDET
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AL GAUDET in 417 ALFRED STREET U.S. ROUTE 111, BIDDEFORD, ME 04005 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340151356.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AL GAUDET
- Site address
- 417 ALFRED STREET U.S. ROUTE 111
- City
- BIDDEFORD
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04005
- Mailing
- 355 NORTHEAST ROAD, STANDISH, ME 04084
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.404 B01 I
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $368 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): The employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites: Job Site - The employer did not use ground fault circuit interrupters nor were they using an assured equipment grounding conductor program.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $368
- · C (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.405 B02
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $368 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(2): In energized installations, each outlet box did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy: Job Site - Two energized receptacles did not have faceplates.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $368
- · C (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $474 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Job Site - Employees working on the first floor of the building were not protected from falling down the stairwell on its open side.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $474
- · C (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $474 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and safety monitoring system: Job Site - Two employees working on a flat roof were not protected from falling approximately 9'.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $474
- · C (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.1052 C01 I
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $368 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail: Job Site - The stairway going to the basement was not equipped with a handrail.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $368
- · C (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $474 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: Job Site - The side rails of the extension ladder used to gain access to the roof did not extend 3' beyond the eave of the roof.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $474
- · C (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B22
- Issued
- Jan 8, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 14, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $474 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall: Job Site - An employee was carrying a bundle of shingles up the ladder.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $474
- · C (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340151356.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.