Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: GOLD STAR METALEX

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GOLD STAR METALEX in 10201 HICKS FIELD RD., FORT WORTH, TX 76179 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 340157239.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gold Star Metalex for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gold Star Metalex is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GOLD STAR METALEX
Site address
10201 HICKS FIELD RD.
City
FORT WORTH
State
TX
ZIP
76179
Mailing
10201 HICKS FIELD RD., FORT WORTH, TX 76179
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423930
Employees
24
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition:  Personal protective equipment was not stored appropriately exposing employees to eye, dermal, and inhalation hazards in the following locations:      a) shop      b) scrap yard
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.253 B02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(2)(ii): Inside of buildings, cylinders were not stored in a well-protected, well-ventilated, dry location, at least 20 feet (6.1 m) from highly combustible materials such as oil or excelsior:    In the shop, compressed flammable gas cylinders were stored near other combustible material indoors exposing employees to fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.253 B04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(i): Oxygen cylinders were stored near highly combustible material, especially oil and grease; or near reserve stocks of carbide and acetylene or other fuel-gas cylinders, or near other substance likely to cause or accelerate fire:   In the scrap yard, oxygen gas cylinders were stored near other combustible material exposing employees to fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:    At the scrap yard, the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program exposing employee to chemical inhalation or dermal hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 F06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2015
Abate by
Jun 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): The employer used written materials, such as signs, placards, process sheets, or batch tickets in lieu of affixing labels to individual stationary process containers that failed to identify the container(s) to which they were applicable and did not convey the information required by 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5):  In the shop, containers with chemical were not labeled or marked with product information exposing employees to chemical inhalation or dermal hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340157239.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.