Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: LINGIS MANUFACTURING & MACHINE CO., INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of LINGIS MANUFACTURING & MACHINE CO., INC. in 613 BROWNS CREEK RD., SYCAMORE, PA 15364 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 340161496.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lingis Manufacturing & Machine CO., INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lingis Manufacturing & Machine CO., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
613 BROWNS CREEK RD.
City
SYCAMORE
State
PA
ZIP
15364
Mailing
P.O. BOX 150, WAYNESBURG, PA 15370
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
40
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,570 · Current $2,140 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8470

29 CFR 1910.107(c)(3): Space-heating appliances, steampipes, or hot surfaces shall not be located in a spraying area where deposits of combustible residues may readily accumulate:     a) In the Red Building, on or about January 5, 2015 - A portable oil-fired heater was used in an area where Sherwin-Williams Quick Dry Enamel, Gloss White and Sherwin-Williams Shopcoat Primer Gray were being applied as a spray.  Residue from the two coatings accumulated on the heater.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2140
  • · Z (S) $3570

1910.107 E02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(e)(2): The quantity of flammable or combustible liquids kept in the vicinity of spraying operations were not at a minimum required for operations or they exceeded a supply for one day or one shift:  a) In the Red Building, on or about January 5, 2015 - The quantity of Sherwin-Williams Quick Dry Enamel, Sherwin-Williams Shopcoat Primer and Sherwin-Williams SW-1 Lacquer Thinner kept adjacent to spray coating operations exceeded the supply for one shift.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.107 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2015
Abate by
Jul 14, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8470

29 CFR 1910.107(g)(2): All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary:  a) In the Red Building, on or about January 5, 2015 - Overspray of Sherwin-Williams Quick Dry Enamels and Sherwin-Williams Shopcoat primer had accumulated in the spray area where employees spray coat mining industry equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.107 G05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2015
Abate by
Jun 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(5): The use of solvents for cleaning spray nozzles and auxiliary equipment were not restricted to those having flashpoints not less than the flashpoints of those solvents normally used in spray operations:  a) In the Red Building, on or about January 5, 2015 - A painter was using Sherwin-Williams R7K119 Lacquer Thinner to clean a spray nozzle.  Sherwin-Williams SW-1 Lacquer Thinner has a flashpoint of 1 deg. F. which is lower than the flashpoints of Sherwin-Williams paints used in spraying mining industry parts.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2015
Abate by
Jun 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    a) In the Red Building, on or about January 5, 2015 - The employer's written respiratory program did not contain work site specific procedures for selecting respirators.  A Painter is required to wear a 3M half-mask air-purifying respirator while spray coating air regulator doors with Sherwin Williams Quick Dry Enamel.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1260
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2015
Abate by
Jun 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) In the Red Building, on or about January 5, 2015 - The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine a Painter/Laborer's ability to use a 3M half-mask air-purifying respirator before the Painter/Laborer was required to wear the respirator while applying coatings to mine equipment with an electric airless spray gun.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  a) In the Red Building, on or about January 5, 2015 - A Painter/Laborer required to wear a 3M half-mask air-purifying respirator while applying coatings to mine equipment with an electric airless spray gun was not fit tested with that respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 II

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2015
Abate by
Jun 8, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:  a) In the Red Building, on or about January 5, 2015 - Employee training did not include the health hazards of Sherwin Williams Quick Dry Enamel.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340161496.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.