AUSTIN, TX —
OSHA Inspection: EAST FRAMING INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EAST FRAMING INC. in 271 TRINITY HILLS, AUSTIN, TX 78737 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340161991.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EAST FRAMING INC.
- Site address
- 271 TRINITY HILLS
- City
- AUSTIN
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78737
- Mailing
- 3254 JC GALLOWAY RD, GRIMESLAND, NC 27837
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 18
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets. On or about 05 January 2015, and at times prior thereto, an employee without head protection was working below other employees performing framing activities, exposing the employee to the hazard of being struck by falling or flying objects, materials and tools.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. On or about 05 January 2015, two employees were using pneumatic nail guns to perform framing activities without the use of eye protection, exposing the employee to the hazard of being struck by flying objects.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.451 A06
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not constructed in accordance with the design by a qualified person. a) On or about 05 January 2015 an employee was performing framing activities from a temporary elevated work platform on the forks of a rough terrain forklift up to approximately 16 feet above the ground without the scaffold being erected by a qualified person, exposing the employee to a fall hazard. b) On or about 05 January 2015 an employee was performing framing activities from makeshift scaffolding erected around the exterior of the building under construction up to approximately 16 feet above the ground without the scaffold being erected by a qualified person, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. a) On or about 05 January 2015, an employee was performing framing activities from a temporary elevated work platform on the forks of a rough terrain forklift up to approximately 16 feet above the ground without receiving fall protection training from the employer, exposing the employee to a fall hazard. b) On or about 05 January 2015, an employee was performing framing activities from makeshift scaffolding erected around the exterior of the building under construction up to approximately 16 feet above the ground without receiving fall protection training from the employer, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 B02
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide. On or about 05 January 2015, an employee was performing framing activities up to ~16 feet high from makeshift scaffolding where the platform was less than 18 inches wide, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2015
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. a) On or about 05 January 2015, an employee was performing framing activities from a temporary elevated work platform on the forks of a rough terrain forklift up to approximately 16 feet above the ground without receiving scaffold training from the employer, exposing the employee to a fall hazard. b) On or about 05 January 2015, an employee was performing framing activities from makeshift scaffolding erected around the exterior of the building under construction up to approximately 16 feet above the ground without receiving scaffold training from the employer, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.602 C01 II
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii): Modifications or additions affecting the safe operation of the equipment were made without the manufacturer's written approval. On or about 05 January 2015, an unapproved personnel platform on a JLG, rough terrain forklift, was used for an employee to conduct framing activities up to approximately 16 feet high, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Jan 13, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed. On or about 05 January 2015, a worker was using an 8-foot, portable, free-standing ladder that was folded and leaned against the building to pass materials up to an employee above, exposing the worker to a fall hazard of approximately 6 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
More inspections at East Framing INC.
View East Framing INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340161991.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.