Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EAST FRAMING INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EAST FRAMING INC. in 271 TRINITY HILLS, AUSTIN, TX 78737 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340161991.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch East Framing INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for East Framing INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EAST FRAMING INC.
Site address
271 TRINITY HILLS
City
AUSTIN
State
TX
ZIP
78737
Mailing
3254 JC GALLOWAY RD, GRIMESLAND, NC 27837
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets.  On or about 05 January 2015, and at times prior thereto, an employee without head protection was working below other employees performing framing activities, exposing the employee to the hazard of being struck by falling or flying objects, materials and tools.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.  On or about 05 January 2015, two employees were using pneumatic nail guns to perform framing activities without the use of eye protection, exposing the employee to the hazard of being struck by flying objects.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2015
Abate by
Jan 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not constructed in accordance with the design by a qualified person.  a) On or about 05 January 2015 an employee was performing framing activities from a temporary elevated work platform on the forks of a rough terrain forklift up to approximately 16 feet above the ground without the scaffold being erected by a qualified person, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.  b) On or about 05 January 2015 an employee was performing framing activities from makeshift scaffolding erected around the exterior of the building under construction up to approximately 16 feet above the ground without the scaffold being erected by a qualified person, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2015
Abate by
Jan 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  a) On or about 05 January 2015, an employee was performing framing activities from a temporary elevated work platform on the forks of a rough terrain forklift up to approximately 16 feet above the ground without receiving fall protection training from the employer, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.  b) On or about 05 January 2015, an employee was performing framing activities from makeshift scaffolding erected around the exterior of the building under construction up to approximately 16 feet above the ground without receiving fall protection training from the employer, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2015
Abate by
Jan 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide.  On or about 05 January 2015, an employee was performing framing activities up to ~16 feet high from makeshift scaffolding where the platform was less than 18 inches wide, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2015
Abate by
Jan 20, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  a) On or about 05 January 2015, an employee was performing framing activities from a temporary elevated work platform on the forks of a rough terrain forklift up to approximately 16 feet above the ground without receiving scaffold training from the employer, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.  b) On or about 05 January 2015, an employee was performing framing activities from makeshift scaffolding erected around the exterior of the building under construction up to approximately 16 feet above the ground without receiving scaffold training from the employer, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.602 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii): Modifications or additions affecting the safe operation of the equipment were made without the manufacturer's written approval.  On or about 05 January 2015, an unapproved personnel platform on a JLG, rough terrain forklift, was used for an employee to conduct framing activities up to approximately 16 feet high, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed.  On or about 05 January 2015, a worker was using an 8-foot, portable, free-standing ladder that was folded and leaned against the building to pass materials up to an employee above, exposing the worker to a fall hazard of approximately 6 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

View East Framing INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340161991.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.