GOLDEN MEADOW, LA ·
OSHA Inspection: DEAN CONTRACTORS, LLC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of DEAN CONTRACTORS, LLC in W. OF CATFISH LAKE, GOLDEN MEADOW, LA 70357 (NAICS 237120). OSHA activity number 340166107.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DEAN CONTRACTORS, LLC
- Site address
- W. OF CATFISH LAKE
- City
- GOLDEN MEADOW
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 70357
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 3670, HARVEY, LA 70059
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237120
- Employees
- 99
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Mar 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 6, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: a. The employer did not ensure that a monitoring program was implemented when information indicated that employee exposures equaled or exceeded the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels. This violation occurred on or about January 7, 2015 when the employer allowed employees to be exposed to occupational noise that equaled or exceeded the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels when working around noisy equipment such as but not limited to airboats, air compressors, water jet pumps, and heavy equipment.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $2800
- · F (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- Mar 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 6, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: a. The employer did not ensure that an audiometric testing program was established and maintained by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels. This violation occurred on or about January 7, 2015 when laborers exposed to noise at levels equal to or exceeding an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels were not provided audiometric testing.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $2800
- · F (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Mar 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 6, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k): a. The employer did not ensure that employees exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels were trained. This violation occurred on or about January 7, 2015, when laborers exposed to noise an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels were not trained in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k).
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $2800
- · F (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.134 H03 II A
- Issued
- Mar 24, 2015
- Abate by
- Apr 6, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(3)(ii)(A): Respirator inspections did not include a check of respirator function, tightness of connections, and the condition of the various parts including, but not limited to, the face piece, head straps, valves, connecting tube, and cartridges, canisters or filters: a. The employer did not ensure that the respirator inspection included a check of respirator function, tightness of connections, and the condition of the various parts including, but not limited to, the face piece, head straps, valves, connecting tube, and cartridges, canisters or filters. This violation occurred when the employer allowed an employee to use an airline respirator for sandblasting inside a cofferdam without checking the air line connecting tube prior to use. The airline connecting tube has a melted area which allowed a pinhole air leak during use.
Recent events (3)
- · C (S) $3500
- · F (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $3500
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237120)
More inspections in LA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340166107.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.