Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TYSON POULTRY INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TYSON POULTRY INC. in 600 NORTH BERRY STREET, SPRINGDALE, AR 72764 (NAICS 311615). OSHA activity number 340168780.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Tyson Poultry INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tyson Poultry INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TYSON POULTRY INC.
Site address
600 NORTH BERRY STREET
City
SPRINGDALE
State
AR
ZIP
72764
Mailing
600 NORTH BERRY STREET, SPRINGDALE, AR 72764
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311615
Employees
1236
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 J04 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 450 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2015
Abate by
Apr 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(ii):  Inspections and testing procedures performed on process equipment to maintain its mechanical integrity, did not follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.    The employer does not ensure that inspection and testing procedures performed on process equipment to maintain its mechanical integrity followed recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP).     The violation occurred in the Ammonia Refrigeration Engine Rooms on or about January 8, 2015 and at times prior thereto. Employees were exposed to fire, explosion, and/or inhalation hazards from ammonia vapors when the employer failed to ensure testing and inspections of safety systems were conducted in accordance with RAGAGEP for safety systems such as but not limited to:     a.     Compressor High Discharge Pressure Cut Out  b.     Compressor High/Low Oil Pressure Differential Cut Out  c.      Compressor High Discharge Temperature Cut Out     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure that inspection and testing procedures performed on process equipment to maintain its mechanical integrity followed recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.165 B03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1236 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2015
Abate by
Apr 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $4,000
29 CFR 1910.165(b)(3): The employee alarm was not distinctive and recognizable as a signal to evacuate the work area or to perform action designated under the emergency action plan.       The employer does not ensure that an employee alarm was installed that was distinctive and recognizable as a signal to evacuate the work area or to perform action designated under the emergency action plan.       A.     The violation occurred in the Poultry Processing Plant on or about January 8, 2015 and at times prior thereto. Employees were exposed to inhalation hazards from ammonia vapors when the employer failed to ensure an employee alarm was installed in the facility that was distinctive for ammonia and recognizable as a signal to evacuate the work area.       Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date the employer must submit documentation showing it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure that an employee alarm was installed that was distinctive and recognizable as a signal to evacuate the work area or to perform action designated under the emergency action plan.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $4000
  • — C (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $4000

View Tyson Poultry INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340168780.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.