Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: A & A MACHINE CO. INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of A & A MACHINE CO. INC. in 1085 INDUSTRIAL HWY, SOUTHAMPTON, PA 18954 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 340170281.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A & a Machine CO. INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A & a Machine CO. INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1085 INDUSTRIAL HWY
City
SOUTHAMPTON
State
PA
ZIP
18954
Mailing
1085 INDUSTRIAL HWY, SOUTHAMPTON, PA 18954
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
21
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2015
Abate by
Mar 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  (a) Production Workshop Area  On or about January 7, 2015, an employee performed various duties in the production work area where lockout/tag out hardware was used, but the company had not yet developed a lockout/tag out program, exposing employees to injury.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.147 C07 I B

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2015
Abate by
Mar 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Affected employees were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure:  (a) Production Workshop Area  On or about January 7, 2015, an employee performed various duties in the production work area where lockout/tag out hardware is used, but the employer had not received awareness-level lockout/tag out training, exposing employees to injury.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2015
Abate by
Mar 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by:   a) Production Work Area, East wall, Next to Front Door: On or about January 7, 2015, employees used a DoAll vertical band saw with a blade that was inadequately guarded, exposing the operator to a point-of-operation/laceration hazard.       b) Production Work Area, Shipping Department: On or about January 7, 2015, employees used a Powermatic vertical band saw that had a blade that was inadequately guarded, exposing the operator to a point-of-operation/laceration hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2015
Abate by
Mar 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:   a) Tool Room Area: On or about January 7, 2015, an employee used a Dayton Dual-Wheel bench grinder that had a work-rest not properly of adjusted, exposing employees to potential injury from flying debris.      b) Shipping Work Area: On or about January 7, 2015, an employee used a Dayton Pedestal grinder that had a work-rest not properly of adjusted, exposing employees to potential injury from flying debris.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2015
Abate by
Mar 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) Tool Room Area: On or about January 7, 2015, employees used two unlabeled spray bottles of a lubricant to service parts and equipment, but the employer did not have a written Hazard Communication Program to provide right-to-know information and training to employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2015
Abate by
Mar 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): The employer used written materials, such as signs, placards, process sheets, or batch tickets in lieu of affixing labels to individual stationary process containers that failed to identify the container(s) to which they were applicable and did not convey the information required by 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5):  a) Tool Room Area: On or about January 7, 2015, employees used two spray bottles of a lubricant to service parts and equipment, but the bottle was not labeled, tagged or marked to indicate its contents, exposing employees to safety and or health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2015
Abate by
Mar 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s)  a) Tool Room Area: On or about January 7, 2015, employees were assigned various job tasks, to include the use/handle of lubricants to service parts and equipment, but no safety data sheets were available to employees in the work place.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Mar 10, 2015
Abate by
Mar 27, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Tool Room Area: On or about January 7, 2015, employees used two unlabeled spray bottles of a lubricant to service parts and equipment, but the employer had not provided employees with Hazard Communication training, exposing employees to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View A & a Machine CO. INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340170281.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.