KITTANNING, PA —
OSHA Inspection: MEGNIN MILLS, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MEGNIN MILLS, INC. in 12261 US ROUTE 422, KITTANNING, PA 16201 (NAICS 333243). OSHA activity number 340177435.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MEGNIN MILLS, INC.
- Site address
- 12261 US ROUTE 422
- City
- KITTANNING
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 16201
- Mailing
- 12261 US ROUTE 422, KITTANNING, PA 16201
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333243
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $816 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: (a) Facility, 12261 US Route 422, Kittanning, PA: On or about 01/12/15 employees who are exposed to flying particles and wood were not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $816
- — Z (S) $1360
1910.133 A03
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee who wears prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involve eye hazards wears eye protection that incorporates the prescription in its design, or wears eye protection that can be worn over the prescription lenses without disturbing the proper position of the prescription lenses or the protective lenses: (a) Facility, 12261 US Route 422, Kittanning, PA: On or about 01/12/15 employees who wear prescription lenses were not wearing eye protection that incorporated the prescription in its design nor were they wearing eye protection that could be worn over their prescription glasses. The employees are operating or working around equipment that generates wood pieces and particles and the appropriate eye protection is not being utilized.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C07 I A
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $816 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation: (a) Facility, 12261 US Route 422, Kittanning, PA: On or before 01/12/15 employees who perform servicing and maintenance of equipment had not received training in the recognition of the hazardous energy sources, type and magnitude of the energy or the methods and means necessary for energy isolation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $816
- — Z (S) $1360
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,020 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees: (a) Facility, 12261 US Route 422, Kittanning, PA: On or about 01/12/15 an employee was under a conveyor unclogging a dust collection system for the splitting saw and none of the equipment had been locked or tagged out to isolate the energy. (b) Facility, 12261 US Route 422, Kittanning, PA: On or about 01/12/15 an employee was adjusting the guide wheels on the band saw mill and the equipment had not been locked or tagged out to isolate the energy.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1020
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): (a) Facility, 12261 US Route 422, Kittanning, PA: On or about 01/09/15 there was no point of operation guarding on the splitting saw to protect employees from the 52 inch rotating blade. An employee who was assisting the operator with the sawing operations suffered an amputation to their left index finger when contact was made with the rotating blade. There were no guards or other barriers in place to prevent contact with the danger zone during sawing operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 27, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $816 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): (a) Facility, 12261 US Route 422, Kittanning, PA: On or about 01/23/15 the inclined belt on the cut off saw was not enclosed to protect the operator from the rotating parts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $816
- — Z (S) $1360
1910.265 E05 II A
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $1,020 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.265(e)(5)(ii)(a): The top(s) and opening(s) in end and side frame(s) of edger(s) were not adequately guarded: (a) Facility, 12261 US Route 422, Kittanning, PA: On or about 01/23/15 the top on edger #1 was not adequately guarded in that the guard does not cover enough of the saw blade to protect employees from the rotating blade. The operator of edger #2 is positioned approximately 1 foot away from edger #1 exposing the employee to potential contact with the rotating blade.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1020
- — Z (S) $1700
More inspections at Megnin Mills, INC.
View Megnin Mills, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333243)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340177435.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.