Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,547Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-01 Last loaded 2026-09-04

OSHA Inspection: SCIOTO TRAIL ANIMAL CLINIC, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SCIOTO TRAIL ANIMAL CLINIC, INC. in 2710 SCIOTO TRAIL, PORTSMOUTH, OH 45662 (NAICS 541940). OSHA activity number 340177500.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Scioto Trail Animal Clinic, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Scioto Trail Animal Clinic, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2710 SCIOTO TRAIL
City
PORTSMOUTH
State
OH
ZIP
45662
Mailing
2710 SCIOTO TRAIL, PORTSMOUTH, OH 45662
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
541940
Employees
17
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 17 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2015
Abate by
Mar 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $340 · Current $238 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0175129016602260

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  (a)  The employer had not completed a formal assessment of the hazards present in the workplace and the PPE required to protect employees working in a veterinary hospital from those hazards.   In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET)
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $238
  • · Z (O) $340

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 17 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2015
Abate by
Mar 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0175129016602260

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  (a)  The employer had not completed a written certification of a formal assessment of the hazards present in the workplace that would require PPE to protect employees working in a veterinary hospital from those hazards.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 17 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2015
Abate by
Mar 2, 2015
Penalty
Initial $340 · Current $238 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0175129016602260

29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  (a)  Employees who poured formaldehyde and Roccal-D from large containers into smaller ones did not have an eyewash station available.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET)
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $238
  • · Z (O) $340

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 17 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2015
Abate by
Mar 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $340 · Current $238 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0175129016602260

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  (a)  The employer did not have a written hazard communication program which described how veterinary clinic employees would be informed about the hazardous chemicals in the workplace, such as formaldehyde and Roccal-D disinfectant, labeling and Safety Data Sheets.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $238
  • · Z (O) $340

1910.1200 F05 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 17 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2015
Abate by
Feb 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0175129016602260

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:   (a) Spray bottles of diluted Roccal-D disinfectant that were used to clean the tables in the exam rooms were not labeled.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET)
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F05 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 17 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2015
Abate by
Feb 13, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0175129016602260

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:   (a) Spray bottles of diluted Roccal-D disinfectant that were used to clean the tables in the exam rooms were not labeled.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET)
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340177500.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.