Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: AMARAL REVITE CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AMARAL REVITE CORPORATION in BURGER KING, 117 ELM STREET, ENFIELD, CT 06082 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340180405.

Watch Amaral Revite Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Amaral Revite Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
BURGER KING, 117 ELM STREET
City
ENFIELD
State
CT
ZIP
06082
Mailing
148 WEST RIVER STREET, SUITE 5, PROVIDENCE, RI 02904
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  On or about 1/14/2015 at the Burger King Construction Project, an employee was working below an aerial lift and construction being performed above him and the employee was not wearing a hard hat.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.453 B02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(iv): Employee(s) working in an aerial lift were not standing firmly on the floor of the basket:  On or about 1/14/2015 at the Burger King Construction Project, an employee was working from an aerial lift and was working from the mid rail of the aerial lift without any personal fall protection system in use.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated:  On or about 1/14/2015 at the Burger King Construction Project, an employee was working from an aerial lift and was not using a personal fall protection system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:  On or about 1/14/2015 at the Burger King Construction Project, an employee was working from an aerial lift and was using a personal fall arrest system that allowed contact with lower levels.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

View AMARAL REVITE CORPORATION's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340180405.