Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LEADING TECHNOLOGY COMPOSITES, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LEADING TECHNOLOGY COMPOSITES, INC. in 2626 WEST MAY, WICHITA, KS 67213 (NAICS 326130). OSHA activity number 340198977.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Leading Technology Composites, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Leading Technology Composites, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2626 WEST MAY
City
WICHITA
State
KS
ZIP
67213
Mailing
2626 WEST MAY, WICHITA, KS 67213
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Records only (C)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326130
Employees
347
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2015
Abate by
May 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    A written certification of the workplace hazard assessment for personal protective equipment had not been developed while requiring employees to wear gloves, earplug, safety glasses.    29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1) requires certification that the abatement of the above violation is complete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.147 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2015
Abate by
May 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish an energy control program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, start up or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment would be isolated and rendered inoperable:    Employees performing servicing and maintenance operations were exposed to hazards associated with the unexpected energization or start-up of the Auto-clay, Presses, Siempelkamp, Chester. Employer did not develop an energy control program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections.    29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1) requires certification that the abatement of the above violation is complete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3500
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2015
Abate by
May 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    Employees perform servicing and maintenance activities on equipment including, but not limited to the Auto-clay, Presses, Siempelkamp, Chester which had multiple energy sources including energy sources such as but not limited to pneumatic, hydraulic, electric, gravity. Written machine specific energy control procedures for these machines were not developed and implemented.    29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1) requires certification and documentation that the abatement of the above violation is complete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2015
Abate by
Apr 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), & (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes items (i) and (ii) of this subparagraph:    A Hazard Communication program had not been developed nor implemented to advise employees of the hazards associated with chemicals/products at the jobsite such as Barsol solvents, Eposy, MEK, Zyvas, hot oil, hydraulic fluid, grease, engine hydraulic oil, diesel engine oil and fluid.    29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1) requires certification that the abatement of the above violation is complete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3000

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2015
Abate by
Apr 15, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): Employees had not been provided with GHS 2012 training including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system to be used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information, and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:    The employer has not updated the hazard communication program and trained employees on the portion of the hazard communication program that explains the labels on shipping containers and the safety data sheets for items such as Barsol solvents, Eposy, MEK, Zyvas, hot oil, hydraulic fluid, grease, engine hydraulic oil, diesel engine oil and fluid, including the order of information and how the employee could obtain and use the hazard information. Employees were not trained regarding the new label elements and safety data sheets format by December 1, 2013.    29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1) requires certification that the abatement of the above violation is complete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3000

View Leading Technology Composites, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340198977.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.