Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GADSDEN TOOL, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GADSDEN TOOL, INC. in 712 NATCO DRIVE, RAINBOW CITY, AL 35906 (NAICS 333514). OSHA activity number 340199843.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gadsden Tool, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gadsden Tool, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GADSDEN TOOL, INC.
Site address
712 NATCO DRIVE
City
RAINBOW CITY
State
AL
ZIP
35906
Mailing
712 NATCO DRIVE, RAINBOW CITY, AL 35906
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333514
Employees
47
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2015
Abate by
May 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    (a) On or about 01/21/15 - Machine shop, maintenance employees and operators are performing servicing and maintenance activities on various CNC milling machines such as the HAAS and Viper without specific procedures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.184 I09 III

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2015
Abate by
Apr 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(i)(9)(iii): Synthetic web sling(s) with snags, punctures, tears, or cuts were not immediately removed from service:     (a) On or about 01/09/15 - Machine shop, employees were using defective nylon slings attached to the overhead crane to lift steel fabrications, exposing employees to crushed-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 10 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2015
Abate by
May 29, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,570 · Current $2,142 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    (a) On or about 01/21/15 - Machine Shop, the Profit Master horizontal lathe didn't have chuck guards installed.    (b) On or about 01/21/15 - Machine Shop, the pedestal belt sander didn't have guarding for ingoing nip points.    (c) On or about 01/21/15 - Machine Shop, the Bridgeport milling & drilling machines did not have a chuck guard installed.    (d) On or about 01/21/15 - Machine Shop, the HAAS milling machine has the front sliding door interlocks bypassed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2142
  • — Z (S) $3570

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2015
Abate by
Apr 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel:     (a) On or about 01/21/15 - Machine shop, a Jet Electric table mounted double wheel bench grinder didn't have the adjustable tongue guard installed on either side.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1428
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.217 B07 V A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2015
Abate by
Apr 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $3,570 · Current $2,142 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(7)(v)(a): Each two-hand control for single stroke operations on mechanical power press(es) using part revolution clutches was not protected against unintended operation:    (a) On or about 01/21/15 - Machine shop, the two hand controls for the part-revolution mechanical power press didn't have guards to protect against accidental press activation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2142
  • — Z (S) $3570

1910.217 C01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2015
Abate by
Apr 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(1)(i): The employer did not provide and ensure the usage of point of operation guards or properly applied point of operation devices on every operation performed on mechanical power press(es):     (a) On or about 01/21/15 - Machine shop, the point of operation for the part-revolution mechanical power press was unguarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.217 D09 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2015
Abate by
Apr 30, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.217(d)(9)(i): The employer did not establish a diesetting procedure for mechanical power press(es) that would ensure compliance with 29 CFR 1910.217(c):     (a) On or about 01/21/15 - Machine shop, a procedure was not established for the part-revolution mechanical press.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.217 D09 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2015
Abate by
Apr 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.217(d)(9)(iii): The employer did not provide die stops or other means to prevent losing control of the die while setting or removing dies on mechanical power press(es) which were are inclined:      (a) On or about 01/21/15 - Machine shop, the part-revolution mechanical power press did not have die blocks or other adequate means to protect employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.217 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2015
Abate by
Jul 9, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.217(e)(1)(i): A program of periodic and regular inspections of mechanical power press(es) was not established and followed to ensure that all parts, auxiliary equipment and safeguards were in a safe operating condition and adjustment:    (a) On or about 01/21/15 - Machine shop, the past-revolution mechanical press wasn't inspected as required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 10 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2015
Abate by
Apr 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,071 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:    (a) On or about 01/21/15 - Machine shop, compressed air nozzles were used with an output of 90 - 100 p.s.i. when cleaning off metal parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1071
  • — Z (S) $1785

1910.303 B07 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2015
Abate by
Apr 23, 2015
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(iv): There was damaged parts that adversely affected safe operation or mechanical strength of the equipment, such as parts that were broken, bent, cut, or deteriorated by corrosion, chemical action, or overheating:    (a) On or about 01/21/15 - Blanchard Rotary Grinder, the 480 volt electrical cabinet disconnect has a missing control handle.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2975

View Gadsden Tool, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340199843.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.