Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RICH DREGNE

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RICH DREGNE in 2133 STONEGATE ROAD, BURLINGTON, WI 53105 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340200906.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rich Dregne — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rich Dregne is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RICH DREGNE
Site address
2133 STONEGATE ROAD
City
BURLINGTON
State
WI
ZIP
53105
Mailing
904 38TH STREET, KENOSHA, WI 53140
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2015
Abate by
Feb 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person.    (a) The employer did not conduct inspections of the worksite to ensure the safety of employees. This exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2000
  • — C (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.502 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2015
Abate by
Feb 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(k)(1): The fall protection plan did not conform to the provisions specified in 1926.502(k)(1) through (k)(10):   (a) The employer did not maintain a written fall protection plan, detailing the alternative fall protection measures, trained employees, and the reason for infeasibility of conventional fall protection. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 11 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2015
Abate by
Feb 11, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:     (a) The employer failed to ensure that each employee conducting carpentry work on a residential building, at 2133 Stonegate Road in Burlington, Wisconsin, were protected from falling to the lower level by the use of a fall protection system.  This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 11 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2015
Abate by
Feb 18, 2015
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    (a) The employer failed to ensure that each employee conducting work on the roof of a residential building, were trained on fall hazards and procedures or systems to utilize to minimize the hazards.  This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 11 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $1600

View Rich Dregne's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340200906.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.