HOPKINTON, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: BRENO MOURAO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BRENO MOURAO in 136 SPRING STREET, HOPKINTON, MA 01748 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 340201375.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BRENO MOURAO
- Site address
- 136 SPRING STREET
- City
- HOPKINTON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01748
- Mailing
- 260 UNION AVE #27, FRAMINGHAM, MA 01701
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.403 B01
- Issued
- May 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1): Employer did not ensure that electrical equipment is free from recognized hazards that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: (a) Location - Spring Street Hopkinton, MA: On or about 1/21/15, employees were exposed to electrical shock and burns when using extension cords that were not protected from damage.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) Location - Spring Street Hopkinton, MA: On 0r about 1/21/15, employees were not protected from falling while working on a surface greater than fourteen feet above a lower level.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.1052 C01
- Issued
- May 21, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail and one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: (a) Location - Spring Street Hopkinton, MA: On or about 1/21/15. employees were exposed to falls ascending and descending a stairwell with an unprotected side.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 340201375.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.